Numerical removal of ring artifacts in microtomography

Review of Scientific Instruments

Volumn 69, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 2978-2980

  Raven, Carsten ^a  

^a EUROPEAN SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FACILITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000852127     PISSN: 00346748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1149043     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. U. Bonse, Z. Johnson, M. Nichols, R. Nusshardt, S. Krasnicki, and J. Kinney, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 246, 644 (1986).
2. B. Flannery, H. Deckman, W. Roberge, and K. D' Amico, Science 237, 1439 (1987).
3. F. Beckmann, U. Bonse, F. Busch, and O. Günnewig, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 21, 539 (1997).
4. L. A. Shepp and J. Stein, in Reconstruction Tomography in Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, edited by M. Ter-Pogossian et al. (University Park Press, Baltimore, 1977), pp. 33-48.
5. G. T. Herman, Image Reconstruction From Projections (Academic, London, 1980).
6. R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1992).
7. K. R. Castleman, Digital Image Processing (Prentice-Hall, London, 1996).
8. A. Snigirev, I. Snigireva, V. Kohn, S. Kuznesov, and I. Schelokov, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 5486 (1995).
9. C. Raven, A. Snigirev, A. Koch, I. Snigireva, and V. Kohn, Proc. SPIE 3149, 140 (1997).
10. A. Koch, C. Raven, P. Spanne, and A. Snigirev, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (to be published).
11. The effective pixel size is given by the real pixel size of 24 μm and the magnification factor of the optical microscope in front of ×40. A binning of 2×2 pixels was performed which leads to an effective pixel size of 1.2 μm.