Persistence of molecular excitations in metallic fullerides and their role in a possible metal to insulator transition at high temperatures

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 15, 2002, Pages 1551241-1551249

  Brouet, V ^a   Alloul, H ^a   Garaj, S ^b   Forro L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON 13; FULLERENE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; HIGH TEMPERATURE PROCEDURES; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATERIALS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT; MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 0000729616     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. A. Auerbach, N. Manini, and E. Tosatti, Phys. Rev. B 49, 12 998 (1994); N. Manini, E. Tosatti, and A. Auerbach, ibid. 49, 13 008 (1994)
2. A. Auerbach, N. Manini, and E. Tosatti, Phys. Rev. B 49, 12 998 (1994); N. Manini, E. Tosatti, and A. Auerbach, ibid. 49, 13 008 (1994)
3. V. Brouet, H. Alloul, S. Garaj, and L. Forró, Phys. Rev. B 66, 155122 (2002).
4. V. Brouet, H. Alloul, F. Quéré, G. Baumgartner, and L. Forró, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2131 (1999).
5. V. Brouet, H. Alloul, and L. Forró, Phys. Rev. B 66, 155123 (2002).
6. W. Victoroff and M. Heritier, J. Phys. I 6, 2175 (1996).
7. O. Gunnarsson, E. Koch, and R.M. Martin, Phys. Rev. B 54, R11 026 (1996).
8. W. Victoroff, Ph.D. thesis, Orsay University, 1997.
9. V. Brouet, H. Alloul, L. Thien-Nga, S. Garaj, and L. Forro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4680 (2001).
10. O. Gunnarsson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 575 (1997)
11. P. W. Stephens, L. Mihaly, P.L. Lee, R.L. Whetten, Shiou-Mei Huang, R. Kaner, F. Deiderich, and K. Holczer, Nature (London) 351, 632 (1991).
12. K. Prassides, C. Christides, I.M. Thomas, J. Mizuki, K. Tanigaki, I. Hirosawa, and T.W. Ebbesen, Science 263, 950 (1994).
13. M. Kosaka, K. Tanigaki, T. Tanaka, T. Atake, A. Lappas, and K. Prassides, Phys. Rev. B 51, 12 018 (1995).
14. R. Tycko, G. Dabbagh, D.W. Murphy, Q. Zhu, and J.E. Fischer, Phys. Rev. B 48, 9097 (1993).
15. C.P. Slichter, Principles of Magnetic Resonance (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989).
16. R. Tycko, G. Dabbagh, M.J. Rosseinsky, D.W. Murphy, A.P. Ramirez, and R.M. Fleming, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1912 (1992).
17. Y. Maniwa et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63, 1139 (1994).
18. Y. Maniwa, T. Saito, K. Kume, K. Kikuchi, I. Ikemoto, S. Suzuki, Y. Achiba, I. Hirosawa, M. Kosaka, and K. Tanigaki, Phys. Rev. B 52, R7054 (1995).
19. V.A. Stenger, C.H. Pennington, D.R. Buffinger, and R.P. Ziebarth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1649 (1995).
20. G.A. Samara, J.E. Schirber, B. Morosin, L.V. Hansen, D. Loy, and A.P. Sylwester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1687 (1992).
21. O. Zhou and D.E. Cox, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 53, 1373 (1992).
22. T. Yldirim, J.E. Fisher, R. Dinnebier, P.W. Stephens, and C.L. Lin, Solid State Commun. 93, 269 (1995).
23. C.M. Brown, T. Takenobu, K. Kordatos, K. Prassides, Y. Iwasa, and K. Tanigaki, Phys. Rev. B 59, 4439 (1999).
24. J. Robert, P. Petit, T. Yldirim, and J.E. Fischer, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1226 (1998).
25. R.M. White, Quantum Theory of Magnetism (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg 1983).
26. R. Kerkoud, P. Auban-Senzier, D. Jerome, S. Brazovskii, I. Luk'yanchuk, N. Kirova, F. Rachdi, and C. Goze, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 57, 143 (1996).
27. A.F. Hebard, T.T.M. Palstra, R.C. Haddon, and R.M. Fleming, Phys. Rev. B 48, 9945 (1993).
28. M. Knupfer, M. Merkel, M.S. Golden, J. Fink, O. Gunnarsson, and V.P. Antropov, Phys. Rev. B 47, 13 944 (1993).
29. N. Cegar, F. Simon, S. Garaj, L. Forró, B. Ruzicka, L. Degiorgi, V. Brouet, and L. Mihaly, cond-mat/0002447 (unpublished).
30. W.W. Warren, Jr., Phys. Rev. B 3, 3708 (1971).
31. H. Alloul, K. Holczer, Y. Yoshinari, and O. Klein, Physica C 235-240, 2509 (1994).
32. V.A. Stenger, C. Recchia, J. Vance, C.H. Pennington, D.R. Buffinger, and R.P. Ziebarth, Phys. Rev. B 48, 9942 (1993).
33. G. Zimmer, M. Helmle, M. Mehring, F. Rachdi, J. Reichenbach, L. Firlej, and P. Bernier, Europhys. Lett. 24, 59 (1993).
34. 133Cs definitely shows that it is the hyperfine coupling that is changing and not the susceptibility.
35. 1 would be a more sensitive test, but quadrupolar relaxation probably dominates at high T and it cannot be used.
36. O. Chauvet, G. Oszlanyi, L. Forró, P.W. Stephens, M. Tegze, G. Faigel, and A. Janossy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2721 (1994).
37. A. Lappas, M. Kosaka, K. Tanigaki, and K. Prassides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 7560 (1995).
38. A.J. Millis, Nature (London) 392, 147 (1998).