A comparison of networks between industry and public sector research in materials technology and biotechnology

Research Policy

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 255-271

  Peters, Lois ^a   Groenewegen, Peter ^b   Fiebelkorn, Nico ^b  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Public private cooperation; R D; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000614361     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00040-7     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Blanchi, P., Bellini, N., 1991. Public policies for local networks of innovators. Res. Policy 20, 487-497.
2. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Freeman, L.C., 1992. UCINET IV Version 1.00. Analytic Technologies, Columbia, NC.
3. Burrill, G., Lee, S., Lee, K., 1992. Biotech 93 Accelerating Commercialization: An Industry Annual Report. Berkeley, Ernst & Young.
4. Burt, R.S., 1991. Structure Version 4.2. Columbia University, New York.
5. Caracostas, P., Soete, L., 1997. The building of cross-border institutions in Europe: Towards a European system of innovation? In: Edquist, C. (Ed.), Systems of Innovation, Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. Pinter, London, pp. 395-419.
6. Chenais, F., 1988. Multinational enterprises and the international diffusion of technology. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London.
7. Commission of the European Communities (CEC), 1989a. Council decision of 14 March 1989 on a specific research and technological development program in the field of industrial manufacturing technologies and advanced materials applications (BRITE-EURAM) (1989 to 1992) (89/237/EEC). Official Journal of the European Economic Community no. L 360, pp. 18-28.
8. Commission of the European Communities (CEC), 1989b. Council decision of 27 November 1989 on a specific research and technological development program in the field of biotechnology (1990 to 1994) (BRIDGE) (89/621/EEC). Official Journal of the European Economic Community no. L 360, pp. 32-41.
9. Commission of the European Communities (CEC), 1992. BRITE and EURAM, Evaluation study of finished projects: synthesis report. Brussels-Luxembourg.
10. Commission of the European Communities (CEC), 1995. Evaluation of the BRIDGE Programme (1990-1994). EUR16650 EN, Brussels-Luxembourg.
11. Committee on Materials Science and Engineering, 1989. Materials Science and Engineering for the 1990s, Maintaining Competitiveness in the Age of Materials. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
12. European Commission, 1994. The European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 1994. EUR 15897, Brussels-Luxembourg.
13. Faulkner, W., Senker, J., 1995. Knowledge Frontiers, Public Sector Research and Industrial Innovation in Biotechnology, Engineering Ceramics and Parallel Computing. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
14. Edquist, C. (Ed.), 1997. Systems of Innovation, Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. Pinter, London.
15. Freeman, C., 1991. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Res. Policy 20, 499-514.
16. Genetic Engineering News, 1991. Engineering News Guide to Biotechnology Companies. Mary Leiber Publications, NJ, pp. 16-49.
17. Gersony, N., Peters, L.S., 1997. A strategic alliance typology for new technological ventures. Am. Business Rev. 15, 63-70.
18. Hagedoorn, J., 1991. Global Strategies in Innovation: Networks in Research and Production. Int. J. Technol. Manage., 81-94.
19. Hagedoorn, J., Schakenraad, J., 1991. Interfirm partnerships for generic technologies - The case of new materials. Technovation 11, 429-444.
20. Imai, K., Baba, Y., 1989. Systematic innovation and Cross Border networks: Transcending Markets and Hierarchies to create a new techno-economic system. OECD, Conference on Science Technology and Economic Growth, Paris, June, 1989.
21. Katz, J.S., Martin, B.R., 1997. What is research collaboration?. Res. Policy 26, 1-18.
22. Littler, D., Wilson, D., 1991. Strategic alliancing in computerized business systems. Technovation 11, 457-472.
23. Mytelka, L., Delapierre, M., 1987. The alliance strategies of European firms in the information technology industry and the role of ESPRIT. J. Common Market Studies 26.
24. Nelson, R.R., 1993. National Systems of Innovation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
25. Ohmae, K., 1985. Triad Power: The Coming Shape of Global Competition. McKinsey, London.
26. OTA, Office of Technology Assessment, 1988, Advanced Materials by Design, New Structural Materials Technologies. Office of Technology Assessment, Washington DC.
27. Peters, L., 1989. Academic crossroads. STI Rev., 163-193.
28. Peters, L., Fusfeld, H.I., 1982. Current U.S. University Industry Research Connections. National Science Board, Washington, DC.
29. Peterson, J., 1991. Technology policy in Europe: explaining the framework program and Eureka in theory and practice. J. Common Market Studies 29, 269-290.
30. Peterson, J., 1993. Assessing the performance of European collaborative R&D policy: the case of Eureka. Res. Policy 22, 243-264.
31. Saxenian, A., 1991. The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. Res. Policy 20, 423-437.
32. Senker, J., 1996. National systems of innovation, organizational learning and industrial biotechnology. Technovation 16, 219-229.
33. Senker, J., Faulkner, W., 1992. Industrial use of public sector research in advanced technologies: A comparison of biotechnology and ceramics. R&D Manage., 157-175.
34. Solow, R.M., 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev. Econ. Stat. 39, 312-320.
35. Stanckiewicz, R., 1983. Academics and Entrepreneurs. Pinter, London.
36. Trist, E., 1983. Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Hum. Rel. 36, 269-284.
37. Wasserman, S., Faust, K., 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
38. Wellman, B., Berkowitz, S.D., 1988. Social Structures a Network Approach. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
39. Wield, D., Roy, R., 1995. R&D and corporate strategies in UK materials - innovating companies. Technovation 15, 195-210.