메뉴 건너뛰기
Learned Publishing
Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 185-191
A critical examination of the peer review process
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

EID: 0000471550     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/09531519850146355     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (14)
References (14)
  • 1
    • 0028576904 scopus 로고
    • Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine
    • Goodman SN, Berlin J, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine 1994;121:11-21.
    • (1994) Annals of Internal Medicine , vol.121 , pp. 11-21
    • Goodman, S.N.1    Berlin, J.2    Fletcher, S.W.3    Fletcher, R.H.4
  • 2
    • 0025100849 scopus 로고
    • The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence
    • Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990;263:1385-9
    • (1990) JAMA , vol.263 , pp. 1385-1389
    • Dickersin, K.1
  • 3
    • 0025055343 scopus 로고
    • The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review
    • McNutt RA, Evans AT, Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. JAMA 1990;263:1371-6.
    • (1990) JAMA , vol.263 , pp. 1371-1376
    • McNutt, R.A.1    Evans, A.T.2    Fletcher, R.H.3    Fletcher, S.W.4
  • 4
    • 0028229499 scopus 로고
    • The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review
    • Fisher M, Friedman SB, Strauss B. The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review. JAMA 1994;272:143-6.
    • (1994) JAMA , vol.272 , pp. 143-146
    • Fisher, M.1    Friedman, S.B.2    Strauss, B.3
  • 5
    • 85081460974 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The effect of blinding and masking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial
    • in press
    • . van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Smith R, Evans S, Black N. The effect of blinding and masking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial. JAMA (in press).
    • JAMA
    • Van Rooyen, S.1    Godlee, F.2    Smith, R.3    Evans, S.4    Black, N.5
  • 6
    • 85081471058 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: A randomized controlled trial
    • in press
    • Godlee F, Gale CR, Martyn CN. The effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (in press).
    • JAMA
    • Godlee, F.1    Gale, C.R.2    Martyn, C.N.3
  • 7
    • 85081466965 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Masking author identity in peer review: What factors influence masking success?
    • in press
    • Cho M, Justice A, Winker M et al. Masking author identity in peer review: what factors influence masking success? JAMA (in press).
    • JAMA
    • Cho, M.1    Justice, A.2    Winker, M.3
  • 8
    • 85047678991 scopus 로고
    • Anonymity of reviewers
    • Fabiato A. Anonymity of reviewers. Cardiovascular Research 1994;28:1134-9.
    • (1994) Cardiovascular Research , vol.28 , pp. 1134-1139
    • Fabiato, A.1
  • 9
    • 0029798173 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do authors know who refereed their paper? A questionnaire survey
    • Wessely S, Brugha T, Cowen P, Smith L, Paykel E. Do authors know who refereed their paper? A questionnaire survey. BMJ 1996;313:1185.
    • (1996) BMJ , vol.313 , pp. 1185
    • Wessely, S.1    Brugha, T.2    Cowen, P.3    Smith, L.4    Paykel, E.5
  • 10
    • 0022003466 scopus 로고
    • Reviewer status and review quality: Experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation
    • Stossel TP. Reviewer status and review quality: experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation. New Engl J Med 1985;312:658-9
    • (1985) New Engl J Med , vol.312 , pp. 658-659
    • Stossel, T.P.1
  • 11
    • 0027239556 scopus 로고
    • The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good quality reviews
    • Evans AT, McNutt RA, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good quality reviews. J Gen Int Med 1993;8:422-8
    • (1993) J Gen Int Med , vol.8 , pp. 422-428
    • Evans, A.T.1    McNutt, R.A.2    Fletcher, S.W.3    Fletcher, R.H.4
  • 12
    • 0028234337 scopus 로고
    • Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language
    • Nylenna M, Riis P, Karlsson Y. Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language. JAMA 1994;272:149-51
    • (1994) JAMA , vol.272 , pp. 149-151
    • Nylenna, M.1    Riis, P.2    Karlsson, Y.3
  • 14
    • 0028361779 scopus 로고
    • A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review
    • Leband DN, Piette M. A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review. JAMA 1994;272:147-9.
    • (1994) JAMA , vol.272 , pp. 147-149
    • Leband, D.N.1    Piette, M.2

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.