Do authors know who refereed their paper? A questionnaire survey

BMJ

Volumn 313, Issue 7066, 1996, Pages 1185-

  Wessely, S ^a   Brugha, T ^a   Cowen, P ^b   Smith, L ^c   Paykel, E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Littlemore Mental Health Centre   (United Kingdom)

^c ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS; QUESTIONNAIRES; WRITING;

EID: 0029798173     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1185     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Lock S A difficult balance: editorial peer review in medicine. London: BMJ Publishing, 1991.
2. McNutt R, Evan A, Fletcher R, Fletcher S The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review; a randomized trial. JAMA 1990; 263: 1371–6.
3. Fisher M, Friedman S, Strauss B The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review. JAMA 1994; 272: 143–146.
4. Cicchetti D The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submission: a cross disciplinary investigation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1991; 14: 119–186.
5. Sweitzer B, Cullen D How well does a journal's peer review process function? A survey of authors' opinions. JAMA 1994; 272: 152–153.