A complexity approach to innovation networks. the case of the aircraft industry (1909-1997)

Research Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 257-272

  Frenken, Koen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aircraft; Complexity; Innovation network; NK model; Technological paradigm

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000440376     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00064-5     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alchian A. Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy. 58:1950;211-221.
2. Arthur W.B. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal. 99:1989;116-131.
3. Axelrod, R., 1997. The Complexity of Cooperation. Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
4. Constant II, E.W., 1980. The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD.
5. Dalle J.-M. Heterogeneity vs. externalities in technological competition: a tale of possible technological landscapes. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 7:1997;395-413.
6. Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy. 11:1982;147-162.
7. Freeman, C. Perez, C., 1988. Structural crisis of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London, pp. 38-66.
8. Frenken, K., Marengo, L., Valente, M., 1999. Interdependencies, nearly-decomposability and adaptation. In: Brenner, T. (Ed.), Computational Techniques to Model Learning in Economics. Kluwer, Boston, 145-165.
9. Frenken K., Saviotti P.P., Trommetter M. Variety and niche creation in aircraft, helicopters, motorcycles and microcomputers. Research Policy. 28:1999;469-488.
10. Green, W., Swanborough, G. 1982. The World's Civil Airliners, Salamander Books, London.
11. Hayward, K., 1983. Government and British Civil Aerospace. A Case Study in Post-War Technology Policy. Manchester Univ. Press, Manchester.
12. Hayward, K., 1986. International Collaboration in Civil Aerospace, Pinter, London.
13. Jane's, 1978. Jane's Encyclopedia of Aviation, Jane's Publishing, London.
14. Jane's, 1989. Jane's Encyclopedia of Aviation (Studio Editions; London).
15. Jane's, 1998. Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1997-98, Jane's Information Group, Surrey.
16. Kauffman, S.A., 1993. The Origins of Order. Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
17. Kemp R. Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability. Futures. 26:1994;1023-1046.
18. Levinthal D. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science. 43:1997;934-950.
19. Leydesdorff, L., 1995. The Challenge of Scientometrics. The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications. DSWO Press, Leiden Univ., Leiden.
20. Leydesdorff, L., 1998. The triple helix as an evolutionary model. Paper presented at the Second Symposium on the Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations "The Future Location of Research", New York, 7-10 January.
21. Leydesdorff L., Etzkowitz H. Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy. 23:1996;279-286.
22. Lundvall, B., 1988. Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London, pp. 349-369.
23. Miller, R., Sawers, D., 1968. The Technical Development of Modern Aviation. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
24. Mowery, D.C., Rosenberg, N., 1982. The commercial aircraft industry. In: Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), Government and Technical Progress. A Cross-Industry Analysis. Pergamon, New York, pp. 101-161.
25. Nelson, R.R., 1994. Economic growth via the co-evolution of technology and institutions. In: Leydesdorff, L., Van den Besselaar, P. (Eds.), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies. Pinter, London, pp. 21-32.
26. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy. 6:1977;36-76.
27. Rip, A., Misa, T., Schot, J., 1995. Managing Technology in Society. The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, Pinter, London.
28. Rosenberg, N., 1982. Inside the Black Box. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
29. Saviotti, P.P., 1996. Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Brookfield.
30. Scharnhorst A. Citation - networks, science landscapes and evolutionary strategies. Scientometrics. 43:1998;95-106.
31. Soete L.G., Wyatt S.M.E. The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator. Scientometrics. 5:1983;31-54.
32. Theil, H., 1967. Economics and Information Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
33. Theil, H., 1972. Statistical Decomposition Analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
34. Van den Belt, H., Rip, A., 1987. The Nelson-Winter-Dosi model and synthetic dye chemistry. In: Bijker, W., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T. (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 135-158.
35. Vernon R. International investment and international trade in the product life-cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 80:1966;190-207.
36. Von Hippel, E., 1988. The Sources of Innovation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
37. Windrum P., Birchenhall C. Is product life-cycle theory a special case? Dominant designs and the emergence of market niches through coevolutionary learning. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 9:1998;109-134.