Statistical analysis of the computed X̃2A1/Ã2B2 spectrum of NO2: Some insights into the causes of its irregularity

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 109, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1824-1832

  Santoro, Fabrizio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000218499     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.476758     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. T. A. Brody, J. Flores, J. B. French, P. A. Mello, A. Pandey, and S. S. M. Wong, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 385 (1981).
2. Th. Zimmermann, L. S. Cederbaum, H.-D. Meyer, and H. Köppel, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 4446 (1987).
3. Th. Zimmermann, L. S. Cederbaum, and H. Köppel, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 92, 217 (1988).
4. M. V. Berry and M. Tabor, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 356, 375 (1977).
5. P. Pechukas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 943 (1983).
6. M. V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 400, 229 (1985).
7. A. Delon, R. Jost, and M. Lombardi, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 5701 (1991).
8. R. Georges, A. Delon, F. Bylicki, R. Jost, A. Capargue, A. Charvat, M. Chevenier, and F. Stoeckel, Chem. Phys. 190, 207 (1995).
9. R. Georges, A. Delon, and R. Jost, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1732 (1995).
10. G. Persch, E. Mehdizadeh, W. Demtröder, Th. Zimmermann, H. Köppel, and L. S. Cederbaum, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 92, 312 (1988).
11. Th. Zimmermann, H. Köppel, L. S. Cederbaum, G. Persch, and W. Demtröder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 3 (1988).
12. E. Haller, H. Köppel, and L. S. Cederbaum, Chem. Phys. Lett. 101, 215 (1983).
13. Th. Zimmermann, H. Köppel, and L. S. Cederbaum, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 3934 (1989).
14. W. Karrlein, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 3293 (1991).
15. A. Ferretti, G. Moruzzi, and N. K. Rahman, Phys. Rev. A 36, 3736 (1987).
16. R. Cimiraglia, A. Ferretti, and N. K. Rahman, Chem. Phys. Lett. 151, 38 (1988).
17. F. Santoro and C. Petrongolo, Adv. Quantum Chem. (submitted).
18. E. Leonardi, C. Petrongolo, G. Hirsh, and R. J. Buenker, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9051 (1996), and references therein.
19. D. M. Leitner, H. Köppel, and L. S. Cederbaum, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 434 (1996).
20. F. J. Dyson and M. L. Mehta, J. Math. Phys. 4, 701 (1963).
21. M. V. Berry and M. Robnik, J. Phys. A 17, 2413 (1984).
22. Th. Zimmermann, H. D. Meyer, H. Köppel, and L. S. Cederbaum, Phys. Rev. A 33, 4334 (1986).
23. BR values change only slightly with an average shift of 0.02.
24. M. Feingold and S. Fishman, Physica D 25, 181 (1987).
25. D. M. Leitner, J. D. Doll, and R. M. Whitnell, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 6644 (1991).
26. R. U. Haq, A. Pandey, and O. Bohigas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1086 (1982).
27. A. Pandey, Ann. Phys. 119, 170 (1979).
28. R. Brandi, F. Santoro, and C. Petrongolo, Chem. Phys. 225, 55 (1997).
29. It is interesting to notice, from their Sec. V and Eqs. (3.2a) and (3.2d) of their Sec. III (Ref. 19), that one of the effects of a more peaked seam between the two minima is the increase of the symmetric stretch-bend couplings.