Double C-H activation on osmium and ruthenium centers: Carbene vs olefin products

Organometallics

Volumn 21, Issue 13, 2002, Pages 2601-2603

  Gusev, Dmitry G ^a   Lough, Alan J ^a,b  

^a WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXATION; DEHYDROGENATION; OSMIUM; RUTHENIUM;

CYCLOMETALATION;

ORGANOMETALLICS;

EID: 0000116572     PISSN: 02767333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/om020355m     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Recent reviews: (a) Albrecht, M.; van Koten, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3750.
2. (b) Vigalok, A.; Milstein, D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 798.
3. (c) Jensen, C. M. Chem. Commun. 1999, 2443.
4. (d) Rybtchinski, B.; Milstein, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 870.
5. (a) Crocker, C.; Errington, R. J.; McDonald, W. S.; Odell, K. J.; Shaw, B. L. Chem. Commun. 1979, 498.
6. (b) Al-Salem, N. A.; Empsall, H. D.; Markham, R.; Shaw, B. L.; Weeks, B. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1979, 1972.
7. (c) Crocker, C.; Errington, R. J.; Markham, R.; Moulton, C. J.; Odell, K. J.; Shaw, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4373.
8. (d) Crocker, C.; Errington, R. J.; Markham, R.; Moulton, C. J.; Shaw, B. L. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1982, 387.
9. (e) Crocker, C.; Empsall, H. D.; Errington, R. J.; Hyde, E. M.; McDonald, W. S.; Markham, R.; Norton, M. C.; Shaw, B. L.; Weeks, B. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1982, 1217.
10. (f) Timmer, K.; Thewissen, D. H. M. W.; Marsman, J. W. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1988, 107, 248.
11. (g) McLoughlin, M. A.; Flesher, R. J.; Kaska, W. C. Organometallics 1994, 13, 3816.
12. Gusev, D. G.; Dolgushin, F. M.; Antipin, M. Y. Organometallics 2001, 20, 1001.
13. POs, = 202 Hz).
14. POs = 213 Hz).
15. 3, Z = 4, 150 K, λ = 0.710 73 Å, 2.85 = θ = 27.48° 15 682 total reflections, 5639 independent reflections (R(int) = 0.033), R1(I > 2σ(I)) = 0.0255, wR2(all data) = 0.0516.
16. Oki, M. In Applications of Dynamic NMR Spectroscopy to Organic Chemistry; VCH: Deerfield Beach, FL, 1985; Chapter 1.
17. 13C NMR spectrum (20 °C), α-CD was shifted to δ 82.10 vs δ 84.45 for α-CH (Δδ = 2.35). Agostic bonding of C-D might be weaker than that of C-H.
18. Desrosiers, P. J.; Cai, L.; Lin, Z.; Richards, R.; Halpern, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 3027.
19. 3, Z = 4, 150 K, λ = 0.710 73 Å, 2.94 = θ = 27.51°; 20 523 total reflections, 5622 independent reflections (R(int) = 0.034), R1(I > 2σ(I)) = 0.0258, wR2(all data) = 0.0584.
20. 3 = 2.3, 2.6 Hz) and did not show an NOE with the hydride.
21. 3, Z = 4, 150 K, λ = 0.710 73 Å, 2.9 = θ = 25.1°, 19 070 total reflections, 4312 independent reflections (R(int) = 0.026), R1(I > 2σ(I)) = 0.0298, wR2(all data) = 0.0757.
22. 2c Bennett, M. A.; Neumann, H. Aust. J. Chem. 1980, 33, 1251.
23. CP = 1.3 Hz, α-CH).
24. (a) Heinekey, D. M.; Hinkle, A. S.; Close, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5353.
25. (b) Sabo-Etienne, S.; Chaudret, B. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2077.