Misspecified maximum likelihood estimates and generalised linear mixed models

Biometrika

Volumn 88, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 973-985

  Heagerty, Patrick J ^a   Kurland, Brenda F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Marginal model; Quasilikelihood; Random effects; Variance estimation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000024102     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/88.4.973     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. AZZALINI, A. (1994). Logistic regression for autocorrelated data with application to repeated measures Biometrika 81, 767-75. Correction (1997), 84, 989.
2. BRESLOW, N. E. & CLAYTON, D. G. (1993). Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 88, 9-25.
3. FITZMAURICE, G. M. & LAIRD, N. M. (1993). A likelihood-based method for analysing longitudinal binary responses. Biometrika 80, 141-51.
4. HEAGERTY, P. J. (1999). Marginally specified logistic-normal models for longitudinal binary data. Biometrics 55, 688-98.
5. HEAGERTY, P. J. & ZEGER, S. L. (2000). Marginalized multilevel model and likelihood inference (with Discussion). Statist. Sci. 15, 1-26.
6. HUBER, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, Ed. L. LeCam and J. Neyman, pp. 221-3. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. LIANG, K.-Y. & HANFELT, J. (1994). On the use of the quasi-likelihood method in teratological experiments. Biometrics 50, 872-80.
8. LIANG, K.-Y. & ZEGER, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73, 13-22.
9. LONGFORD, N. T. (1993). Random Coefficient Models. Oxford University Press.
10. MOLENBERGHS, G., DECLERCK, L. & AERTS, M. (1998). Misspecifying the likelihood for clustered binary data. Comp. Statist. Data Anal. 26, 327-49.
11. NEUHAUS, J. M., HAUCK, W. W. & KALBFLEISCH, J. D. (1992). The effects of mixture distribution misspecification when fitting mixed-effects logistic models. Biometrika 79, 755-62.
12. PALTA, M., LIN, C.-Y. & CHAD, W.-H. (1997). Effect of confounding and other misspecification in models for longitudinal data. In Modelling Longitudinal and Spatially Correlated Data: Methods, Applications, and Future Directions, Lecture Notes in Statistics, 122, Ed. T. G. Gregoire, D. R. Brillinger, P. J. Diggle et al., pp. 77-87. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
13. ROTNITZKY, A. & WYPIJ, D. (1994). A note on the bias of estimators with missing data. Biometrics 50, 1163-70.
14. STIRATELLI, R., LAIRD, N. & WARE, J. H. (1984). Random-effects models for serial observations with binary response. Biometrics 40, 961-70.
15. TAN, M., QU, Y. & RAO, J. S. (1999). Robustness of the latent variable model for correlated binary data. Biometrics 55, 258-63.
16. TEN HAVE, T. R., KUNSELMAN, A. R. & TRAN, L. (1999). A comparison of mixed effects logistic regression models for binary response data with two nested levels of clustering. Statist. Med. 18, 947-60.
17. WHIITE, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 50, 1-26.
18. ZEGER, S. L., LIANG, K.-Y. & ALBERT, P. S. (1988). Models for longitudinal data: A generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 44, 1049-60. Correction (1989), 45, 347.