Misspecifying the likelihood for clustered binary data

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 327-349

  Molenberghs, Geert ^a   Declerck, Lieven ^a   Aerts, Marc ^a  

^a HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Clustered data; Dose response models; Likelihood estimation; Litter effect; Reproductive toxicology

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; RANDOM PROCESSES; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CLUSTERED BINARY DATA; DOSE RESPONSE MODELS; LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; LITTER EFFECT; REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 0032472185     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9473(97)00037-6     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aerts, M., Declerck, L., Molenberghs, G., 1997. Likelihood misspecification and safe dose determination for clustered binary data. Environmetrics, to appear.
2. Altham, P.M., 1978. Two generalizations of the binomial distribution. Appl. Statist. 27, 162-167.
3. Bahadur, R.R., 1961. A representation of the joint distribution of responses to n dichotomous items. In: H. Solomon (Ed.), Studies in Item Analysis and Prediction, Stanford Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, vol. VI. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
4. Catalano, P.J., Ryan, L.M., 1972. Bivariate latent variable models for clustered discrete and continuous outcomes. J Amer. Statist. Assoc. 87, 651-658.
5. Chen, J.J., Kodell, R.L., 1989. Quantitative risk assessment for teratological effects. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 84, 966-971.
6. Chen, J.J., Li, L.-A., 1994. Dose-response modeling of trinomial responses from developmental experiments. Statis. Sinica 4, 265-274.
7. Cox, D.R., 1972. The analysis of multivariate binary data. Appl. Statist. 21, 113-120.
8. Cox, D.R., Wermuth, N., 1994. A note on the quadratic exponential binary distribution. Biometrika 81, 403-408.
9. Declerck, L., Aerts, M., Molenberghs, G., 1997. Behaviour of the likelihood ratio test statistic under a Bahadur model for exchangeable binary data. Submitted for publication.
10. Diggle, P.J., Liang, K.Y., Zeger, S.L., 1994. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11. Food and Drug Administration, Guidelines for reproduction and studies for safety evaluation of drugs for human use. Bureau of Drugs, Rockville, MD (1966).
12. George, E.O., Bowman, D., 1995. A full likelihood procedure for analysing exchangeable binary data. Biometrics 51, 512-523.
13. Hauck, W.W., Donner, A., 1977. Wald's test as applied to hypotheses in logit analysis. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 72, 851-853.
14. Kleinman, J.C., 1973. Proportions with extraneous variance: single and independent samples. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 68, 46-54.
15. Kupper, L.L., Haseman, J.K., 1978. The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics 34, 69-76.
16. Kupper, L.L., Portier, C., Hogan, M.D., Yamamoto, E., 1986. The impact of litter effects on dose-response modeling in teratology. Biometrics 42, 85-98.
17. Lefkopoulou, M., Moore, D., Ryan, L., 1989. The analysis of multiple correlated binary outcomes: application to rodent teratology experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 84, 810-815.
18. Liang, K.-Y., Hanfelt, J., 1994. On the use of the quasi-likelihood method in teratological experiments. Biometrics 50, 872-880.
19. Liang, K.-Y., Zeger, S.L., Qaqish, B., 1992. Multivariate regression analyses for categorical data. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 54, 3-40.
20. Molenberghs, G., Ryan, L.M., 1996. Likelihood inference for clustered multivariate binary data, submitted for publication.
21. Pendergast, J.F., Gange, S.J., Newton, M.A., Lindstrom, M.J., Palta, M., Fisher, M.R., 1996. A survey of methods for analyzing clustered binary response data. Internat. Statist. Rev. 64, 89-118.
22. Prentice, R.L., 1988. Correlated binary regression with covariates specific to each binary observation. Biometrics 44, 1033-1048.
23. Price, C.J., Kimmel, C.A., Tyl, R.W., Marr, M.C., 1985. The developmental toxicity of ethylene glycol in rats and mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 81, 113-127.
24. Rotnitzky, A., Wypij, D., 1994. A note on the bias of estimators with missing data. Biometrics 50, 1163-1170.
25. Ryan, L.M., 1992. Quantitative Risk assessment for developmental toxicity. Biometrics 48, 163-174.
26. Serfling, R.J., 1980. Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York.
27. Skellam, J.G., 1948. A probability distribution derived from the binomial distribution by regarding the probability of a success as variable between the sets of trials. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 10, 257-261.
28. Stiratelli, R., Laird, N., Ware, J.H., 1984. Random effects models for serial observations with binary response. Biometrics 40, 961-971.
29. Tyl, R.W., Price, C.J., Marr, M.C., Kimmel, C.A., 1988. Developmental toxicity evaluation of dietary di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in Fischer 344 rats and CD-1 mice. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 10, 395-412.
30. Williams, D.A., 1975. The analysis of binary responses from toxicological experiments involving reproduction and teratogenicity. Biometrics 31, 949-952.
31. Williams, D.A., 1988. Reader Reaction: Estimation bias using the beta-binomial distribution in teratology. Biometrics 44, 305-307.
32. Zhu, Y., Krewski, D., Ross, W.H., 1994. Dose-response models for correlated multinomial data from developmental toxicity studies. Appl. Statist. 43, 583-598.