The Mayo-Portland Participation Index: A brief and psychometrically sound measure of brain injury outcome

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 85, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1989-1996

  Malec, James F ^a,b  

^a Mayo Clinic   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain injuries; Rehabilitation; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAYO PORTLAND PARTICIPATION INDEX; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BRAIN INJURIES; CAREGIVERS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINNESOTA; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 9944255141     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.01.032     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Malec J.F., Kragness M., Evans R.W., Finlay K.L., Kent A., Lezak M. Further psychometric evaluation and revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a national sample. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 18:2003;479-492
2. Malec J.F., Moessner A.M., Kragness M., Lezak M.D. Refining a measure of brain injury sequelae to predict postacute rehabilitation outcome rating scale analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 15:2000;670-682
3. Jennett B., Snoek J., Bond M.R., Brooks N. Disability after severe head injury observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 44:1981;285-293
4. Wilson J.T., Pettigrew L.E., Teasdale G.M. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 15:1998;573-580
5. Rappaport M., Hall K.M., Hopkins K., Bellesa T. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 63:1982;118-123
6. Willer B., Rosenthal M., Kreutzer J.S., Gordon W.A., Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 8:(2):1993;75-87
7. Hall K.M., Mann N., High W.M., Wright J., Kreutzer J.S., Wood D. Functional measures after traumatic brain injury ceiling effects of FIM, FIM+FAM, DRS, and CIQ. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 11:(2):1996;27-39
8. Hall K.M., Bushnik T., Lakisic-Kazazi B., Wright J., Cantagallo A. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 82:2001;367-374
9. Dijkers M. Measuring the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury a review of Community Integration Questionnaire studies. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 12:(6):1997;74-91
10. Malec J.F., Machulda M.M., Moessner A.M. Differing problem perceptions of staff, survivors and significant others after brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 12:(3):1997;1-13
11. Malec J.F. Comparability of Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory ratings by staff, significant others and people with acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 18:2004;563-575
12. Lam C.S., McMahon B.T., Priddy D.A., Gehred-Schultz A. Deficit awareness and treatment performance among traumatic head injury adults. Brain Inj. 2:1988;235-242
13. Prigatano G.P., Klonoff P., O'Brien K.P., et al. Productivity after neuropsychological oriented milieu rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 9:(1):1994;91-102
14. Sherer M., Bergloff P., Levin E., High W.M., Oden K.E., Nick T.G. Impaired awareness and employment outcome after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 13:(5):1998;52-61
15. Sherer M., Boake C., Clement V., et al. Awareness of deficits after traumatic brain injury Comparison of patient, family, and clinician ratings. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2:1996;17. [abstract]
16. Fordyce D.J., Roueche J.R. Changes in perspectives of disability among patients, staff, and relatives during rehabilitation of brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 31:1986;217-229
17. Malec J.F., Degiorgio L. Characteristics of successful and unsuccessful completers of three postacute brain injury rehabilitation pathways. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 83:2002;1759-1764
18. Malec J.F., Buffington A.L., Moessner A.M., Degiorgio L. A medical/vocational case coordination system for persons with brain injury an evaluation of employment outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 81:2000;1007-1015
19. Malec J.F. Impact of comprehensive day treatment on societal participation for persons with acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 82:2001;885-894
20. Linacre J.M. Facets for Windows. 2003;Winsteps, Chicago
21. Linacre J.M. Many-facet Rasch measurement. 1994;Mesa Pr, Chicago
22. Wright B.D., Masters G.N. Rating scale analysis. 1982;Mesa Pr, Chicago
23. Bond T.G., Fox C.M. Applying the Rasch model fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2001;Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah
24. Sander A.M., Seel R.T., Kreutzer J.S., Hall K.M., High W.M. Jr, Rosenthal M. Agreement between persons with traumatic brain injury and their relatives regarding psychosocial outcome using the Community Integration Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 8:1997;353-357
25. Hart T., Whyte J., Polansky M., et al. Concordance of patient and family report of neurobehavioral symptoms at 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 84:2003;204-213
26. Cusick C.P., Gerhart K.A., Mellick D.C. Participant-proxy reliability in traumatic brain injury outcome research. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 15:2000;739-749