The prejudicial nature of victim impact statements: Implications for capital sentencing policy

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 492-515

  Myers, Bryan ^a   Greene, Edith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 9944249960     PISSN: 10768971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.10.4.492     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Alicke, M. D. (1992). Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 368-378.
2. Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556-574.
3. Alicke, M. D., & Davis, T. L. (1989). The role of a posteriori victim information in judgments of blame and sanction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 362-377.
4. Anderson, J. F. (1997). Will the punishment fit the victims? The case for pretrial disclosure, and the unchartered future of victim impact information in capital jury sentencing. Rutgers Law Journal, 28, 367-434.
5. Ashworth, A. (1993). Victim impact statements and sentencing. Criminal Law Review, 498-509.
6. Austin, W., Walster, E., & Utne, M. K. (1976). Equity and the law: The effect of a harmdoer's "suffering in the act" on liking and assigned punishment. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 163-190). Orlando FL: Academic Press.
7. Baldus, D., Woodworth, G., Zuckerman, D., Weiner, N. A., & Broffitt, B. (1998). Race discrimination and the death penalty in the post-Furman era: An empirical and legal overview with recent findings from Philadelphia. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1638-1770.
8. Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27-46.
9. Beck, J., & Shumsky, R. (1997). A comparison of retained and appointed counsel in cases of capital murder. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 525-538.
10. Bennett v. Angelone, 522 U.S. 269 (1998).
11. Berger, V. (1992). Payne and suffering: A personal reflection and a victim-centered critique. Florida State University Law Review, 20, 21-65.
12. Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45-62.
13. Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496 (1987).
14. Bornstein, B. (1998). From compassion to compensation: The effect of injury severity on mock jurors' liability judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1477-1502.
15. Bornstein, B. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75-91.
16. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
17. Brammer, M. V. (1992). Case notes: Eighth Amendment no longer bars victim impact statement admission in capital sentencing proceedings. Cincinnati Law Review, 61, 261-295.
18. Cargle v. State, 909 P.2d 806 (Okla. Vrim. App. 1995).
19. Clore, G. L., Schwartz, N., & Conway, M. (1993). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 323-417). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Coyne, J. C. (1976). Depression and the response of others. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 186-193.
21. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
22. Davis, R. C., & Smith, B. (1994a). The effects of victim impact statements on sentencing decisions: A test in an urban setting. Justice Quarterly, 11, 453-469.
23. Davis, R. C., & Smith, B. (1994b). Victim impact statements and victim satisfaction: An unfulfilled promise. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 1.
24. Deitz, S. R., Littman, M., & Bentley, B. J. (1984). Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness. Sex Roles, 10, 267-280.
25. Diamond, S. S. (1997). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 53-79.
26. Dugger, A. P. (1996). Victim impact evidence in capital sentencing: A history of incompatibility. American Journal of Criminal Law, 23, 375-404.
27. Efran, M. G. (1974). The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 45-54.
28. Eisenberg, T., & Wells, M. T. (1993). Deadly confusion: Juror instructions in capital cases. Cornell Law Review, 79, 1-15.
29. Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782 (1982).
30. Erez, E. (1990). Victim participation in sentencing: Rhetoric and reality. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 19-31.
31. Erez, E. (1994). Victim participation in sentencing: And the debate goes on. International Review of Victimology, 3, 17-32.
32. Feigenson, N. (2000). Legal blame: How jurors think and talk about accidents. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33. Feigenson, N., Park, J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Effect of victim blameworthiness and outcome severity on attributions of responsibility and damage awards in comparative negligence cases. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 597-617.
34. Finkel, N. (1995). Commonsense justice: Jurors' notions of the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Flamm, J. D. (1999). Due process on the "unchartered seas of irrelevance": Eimiting the presence of victim impact evidence at capital sentencing after Payne v. Tennessee. Washington & Lee Law Review, 56, 295-342.
36. Forgas, J. P. (1992). Affect in social judgments and decisions: A multi-process model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 227-275). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
38. Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
39. Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349 (1977).
40. Garvey, S., Johnson, S., & Marcus, P. (2000). Correcting deadly confusion: Responding to jury inquiries in capital cases. Cornell Law Review, 85, 627-655.
41. Gerbasi, K. C., Zuckerman, M., & Reis, H. T. (1977). Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 323-345.
42. Greene, E. (1999). The many guises of victim impact evidence and effects on jurors' judgments. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 5, 331-348.
43. Greene, E., Johns, M., & Smith, A. (2001). The effects of defendant conduct on jury damage awards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 228-237.
44. Greene, E., Koehring, H., & Quiat, M. (1998). Victim impact evidence in capital cases: Does the victim's character matter? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 145-156.
45. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
46. Hall, D. J. (1991). Victim voices in criminal court: The need for restraint. American Criminal Law Review, 28, 233-266.
47. Hammen, C. L., & Peters, S. D. (1978). Interpersonal consequences of depression: Responses to men and women enacting a depressed role. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 322-332.
48. Hauptman, W. (1997). Lethal reflection: New York's death penalty and victim impact statements. New York Law School of Human Rights, 13, 439-484.
49. Henderson, E. N. (1985). The wrongs of victim's rights. Stanford Law Review, 37, 937-985.
50. Izzett, R., & Fishman, L. (1976). Defendant sentences as a function of attractiveness and justification for actions. Journal of Social Psychology, 100, 285-290.
51. Jones, C., & Aronson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415-419.
52. Kaplan, M. F., & Kemmerick, G. D. (1974). Juror judgment as information integration: Combining evidential and nonevidential information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 493-499.
53. Kelly, D. P. (1984). Victims' perceptions of criminal justice. Pepperdine Law Review, 11, 15-22.
54. Kelman, H. C. (1973). Violence without moral restraint: Reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 25-61.
55. Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 740-752.
56. Kerr, N. L., & Kurtz, S. T. (1977). Effects of a victim's suffering and respectability on mock juror judgments: Further evidence on the just world theory. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 8, 42-56.
57. Kilpatrick, D. G., & Otto, R. K. (1987). Constitutionally guaranteed participation in criminal justice proceedings for victims: Potential effects of psychological functioning. Wayne Slate Law Review, 34, 7-28.
58. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York: Plenum.
59. Levy, J. H. (1993). Limiting victim impact evidence and argument after Payne v. Tennessee. Stanford Law Review, 45, 1027-1060.
60. Lloyd-Bostock, S. (1983). Attributions of cause and responsibility as social phenomena. In J. Jaspers, F. D. Fincham, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental, and social dimensions (pp. 261-289). San Diego CA: Academic Press.
61. Logan, W. (1999a). Through the past darkly: A survey of the uses and abuses of victim impact evidence in capital trials. Arizona Law Review, 41, 143-192.
62. Logan, W. (1999b). When balance and fairness collide: An argument for execution impact evidence in capital trials. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 33, 1-56.
63. Logan, W. (2000). Opining on death: Witness sentence recommendations in capital trials. Boston College Law Review, 41, 517-547.
64. Long, K. (1995). Community input at sentencing: Victim's rights or victim's revenge? Boston University Law Review, 75, 187-228.
65. Luginbuhl, J., & Burkhead, M. (1995). Victim impact evidence in a capital trial: Encouraging votes for death. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 1-16.
66. Luginbuhl, J., & Howe, J. (1995). Discretion in capital sentencing instructions: Guided or misguided? Indiana Law Journal, 70, 1161-1181.
67. McLeod, M. (1987). An examination of the victim's role at sentencing: Results of a survey of probation administrators. Judicature, 162, 164-165.
68. Myers, B., & Arbuthnot, J. (1999). The effects of victim impact evidence on the verdicts and sentencing judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 29, 95-112.
69. Myers, B., Lynn, S. J., & Arbuthnot, J. (2002). Victim impact statements and juror judgments: The effects of harm information and witness demeanor. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2393-2412.
70. Neumann, R., & Strack, F. (2000). "Mood contagion": The automatic transfer of mood between persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 211-223.
71. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
72. Payne v. Tennessee, 111 S. Ct. 2597 (1991).
73. People v. Armstrong, 700 N.E.2d 960 (Illinois, 1998).
74. People v. Ochoa, 966 P.2d 442 (California, 1998).
75. Phares, E. J., & Wilson, K. G. (1972). Responsibility attribution: The role of outcome severity, situational ambiguity, and internal-external control. Journal of Personality, 40, 392-406.
76. Schwartz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, p. 527-561). New York: Guilford Press.
77. Schwartz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Information and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
78. Scroggs, J. R. (1976). Penalties for rape as a function of victim provocativeness, damage and resistance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 360-368.
79. Shanker, N. (1999). Getting a grip on Payne and restricting the influence of victim impact statements in capital sentencing: The Timothy McVeigh case and various state approaches compared. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 26, 711-740.
80. Shaw, J. I., & Skolnick, P. (1996). When is defendant status a shield or a liability? Law and Human Behavior, 20, 431-442.
81. Simon v. State, 688 So.2d 791 (Mississippi, 1997).
82. State v. Frost, 727 So.2d 417 (Louisiana. 1998).
83. State v. Gray, 887 S.W.2d 369 (Missouri, 1994)
84. State v. Nesbit, 978 S.W.2d 872 (Tennessee, 1998).
85. State v. Stevens, 879 P.2d 162 (Oregon, 1994).
86. South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989).
87. Sullins, E. S. (1991). Emotional contagion revisited: Effects of social comparison and expressive style on mood convergence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 166-174.
88. Sullivan, B. E. (1998). Harnessing Payne: Controlling the admission of victim impact statements to safeguard capital sentencing hearings from passion and prejudice. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 25, 601-638.
89. Sumner, C. J. (1987). Victim participation in the criminal justice system. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 20, 195-217.
90. Thomas, J. (1997, June 7). McVeigh's lawyers cite Waco in urging jury to spare his life. The New York Times, p. A8.
91. Walster, E. (1966). Assigning responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73-79.
92. Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 (1990).
93. Weiten, W., & Diamond, S. S. (1979). A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: The case of defendant characteristics. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 71-93.
94. Whittlesey v. State, 655 A.2d 223 (Maryland, 1994).
95. Wiener, R., Pritchard, C., & Weston, M. (1995). Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 455-467.
96. Wissler, R. L., Evans, D. L., Hart, A. J., Morry, M. M., & Saks, M. J. (1997). Explaining "pain and suffering" awards: The role of injury characteristics and fault attributions. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 181-208.
97. Zant v. Stephens, 462 U.S. 862 (1983).