2D and 3D aerodynamic shape optimisation using the adjoint approach

Aerospace Science and Technology

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 715-727

  Brezillon, J ^a   Gauger, N R ^a  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adjoint; Aerodynamic; Airfoil; Numerics; Optimisation; Supersonic aircraft

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT; AIRFOILS; DRAG; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SUPERSONIC FLOW;

ADJOINT; NUMERICS; SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFTS; TRANSONIC FLOWS;

AERODYNAMICS;

EID: 9944242708     PISSN: 12709638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2004.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. W.K. Anderson, V. Venkatakrishnan, Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation, AIAA 97-0643, 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 1997.
2. J.K. Axmann, M. Hadenfeld, O. Frommann, Parallel numerical airplane wing design, in: New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics: Contributions to the 10th AG STAB/DGLR Symposium, Vieweg Verlag, 1996.
3. F. Beux, A. Dervieux, Exact-gradient shape optimization of a 2D Euler flow, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 12 (1992) 281-302.
4. O. Brodersen, M. Hepperle, A. Ronzheimer, C.C. Rossow, B. Schoening, The parametric grid generation system MegaCads, in: Numerical Grid Generation in Computational Field Simulations; Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi, 1996, pp. 353-362.
5. G.W. Burgreen, O. Baysal, Three-dimensional aerodynamic shape optimization of wings using discrete sensitivity analysis, AIAA J. 34 (9) (1996) 1761-1770.
6. J. Elliott, J. Peraire, Aerodynamic design using unstructured meshes, AIAA 96-1941, 1996.
7. O. Frommann, SynapsPointerPro V2.50, Synaps Ingenieur-Gesellschaft mbH, Bremen, Germany, 2002.
8. N.R. Gauger, Das Adjungiertenverfahren in der aerodynamischen Formoptimierung, DLR-Report No. DLR-FB-2003-05, ISSN 1434-8454, 2003.
9. N.R. Gauger, J. Brezillon, Aerodynamic shape optimization using adjoint method, J. Aero. Soc. India 54 (3) (2002) 247-254.
10. R.M. Hicks, P.A. Henne, Wing design by numerical optimization, J. Aircraft 15 (1978) 407-412.
11. R.M. Hicks, E.M. Murman, G.N. Vanderplaats, An assessment of airfoil design by numerical optimization, NASA TM X-3092, Ames Research Center, California, July 1974.
12. A. Iollo, M. Salas, S. Ta'asan, Shape optimization governed by the Euler equations using an adjoint method, ICASE report 93-78, November 1993.
13. A. Jameson, Aerodynamic design via control theory, J. Scientific Comput. 3 (1988) 233-260.
14. A. Jameson, Computational aerodynamics for aircraft design, Science 245 (1989) 361-371.
15. A. Jameson, Optimum aerodynamic design via boundary control, AGARD-R-803, 1994, pp. 3.1-3.33.
16. A. Jameson, Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory, AIAA 95-1729, in: AIAA 12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, 1995.
17. A. Jameson, L. Martinelli, N.A. Pierce, Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations, Theoret. Comput Fluid Dynamics 10 (1998) 213-237.
18. A. Jameson, N.A. Pierce, L. Martinelli, Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations, AIAA 97-0101, AIAA 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, 1997.
19. N. Kroll, B. Eisfeld, H.M. Bleecke, FLOWer, in: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, vol. 71, Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig, 1999, pp. 58-68.
20. N. Kroll, C.C Rossow, K. Becker, F. Thiele, MEGAFLOW - a numerical flow simulation system, in: 21st ICAS Symposium, Melbourne, Australia, 1998, paper 98-2.7.4.
21. N. Kroll, C.C. Rossow, K. Becker, F. Thiele, The MEGAFLOW project, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 4 (2000) 223-237.
22. N. Kroll, C.C. Rossow, D. Schwambom, K. Becker, G. Heller, MEGAFLOW-a numerical flow simulation tool for transport aircraft design, in: ICAS 2002 Congress, 2002, paper 1.10.5.
23. D.A. Lovell, Aerodynamic research to support a second generation supersonic transport aircraft - the EUROSUP project, Eccomas 98 (1998).
24. D. A. Lovell, European research of wave and lift dependent drag for supersonic transport aircraft, AIAA Paper No. 99-3100, 1999.
25. S. Nadarajah, A. Jameson, A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization, AIAA 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA-2000-0667, Reno, NV, January 2000.
26. S. Nadarajah, A. Jameson. Studies of the continuous and discrete adjoint approaches to viscous automatic aerodynamic shape optimization, AIAA 2001-2530, 2001.
27. B. Naujoks, L. Willmes, H. Werner, T. Back, M. Schutz, Multi-point airfoil optimization using evolution strategies, in: Proceedings of EC-COMAS, Barcelona, Spain, 2000.
28. J. Periaux, M. Sefnoui, B. Stoufflet, B. Mantel, E. Laporte, Robust genetic algorithms tor optimization problems in aerodynamic design, in: Genetic Algorithms in Engineering and Computer Sciences, Wiley, New York, 1995.
29. O. Pironneau, On optimum design in fluid mechanics, J. Fluid Mech. 64 ( 1974) 97-110.
30. J. Reuther, A. Jameson, J. Farmer, L. Martinelli, D. Saunders, Aerodynamic shape optimization of complex aircraft configurations via an adjoint formulation, AIAA 96-0094, Reno, 1996.
31. V. Selmin, Multi-point aerodynamic shape optimization: the AEROSHAPE project, in: Proceedings of ECCOMAS, Barcelona, Spain, 2000.
32. D. Tse, Y. Chan, Multi-point design of airfoils by genetic algorithm, in: 8th Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada, Montreal, Canada, 2000.
33. G.N. Vanderplaats, Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill Series in Mechanical Engineering, ISBN 0-07-066964-3, 1984.
34. G.N. Vanderplaats, DOT Users Manual - Ver. 5.0, Vanderplaats Research & Development, Colorado Springs, 2001.
35. P. Weinerfelt, O. Enoksson, Numerical methods for aerodynamic optimization, in: 8th International Symposium on Comp. Fluid Dynamics, Bremen, Germany, 1999.
36. R.T Whitcomb, J.R. Sevier, A supersonic area rule and an application to the design of a wing-body combination with high lift-drag ratios, NASA TR R-72, 1960.