Utilizing advanced hearing aid technologies as pre-processors to enhance cochlear implant performance

Cochlear Implants International

Volumn 5, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages 192-195

  Chung, King ^a   Zeng, Fan Gang ^b   Waltzman, Susan ^c  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEARING; HEARING AID; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MICROPHONE; NOISE REDUCTION; NORMAL VALUE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSOR; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 9944240796     PISSN: 14670100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cii.227     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Alcantara JL, Moore BC, Kuhnel V, Launer S (2003) Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid. International Journal of Audiology 42(1): 34-42.
2. Chung K, Zeng F-G, Waltzman S (submitted) Using hearing aid directional microphones and noise reduction algorithms to enhance cochlear implant performance. Acoustic Research Letters Online.
3. Cord MT, Surr RK, Walden BE, Olsen L (2002) Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 13(6): 295-307.
4. Hawkins DB, Yacullo WS (1984) Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 49: 278-286.
5. Johns M, Bray V, Nilsson M (2001) Effective noise reduction. Auidology Online.
6. Killion MC, Schulien R, Christensen L, Fabry D, Revit L, Niquette P, Chung K (1998) Real world performance of an ITE directional microphone. Hearing Journal 51: 24-38.
7. Ricketts TA, Henry P (2002) Evaulation of an adaptive directional-microphone hearing aid. International Journal of Audiology 41: 100-112.
8. Ricketts T, Henry P, Gnewikow. (2002) Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids. Ear and Hearing 24(5): 424-439.
9. Schum D, Pogash R (2002) Initial clinical verification of a DSP instrument. Hearing Review 9(9): 48-51.
10. Thompson SC (1999) Dual microphones or directional-plus-omni: which is best? High Performance Hearing Solutions 3: 31-35.
11. Wouters J, Vanden Berghe J (2001) Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implantees with a two-microphone monaural adaptive noise reduction system. Ear and Hearing 22(5): 420-430.