Dentists' agreement on treatment of asymptomatic impacted third molar teeth: Interview study

British Medical Journal

Volumn 315, Issue 7117, 1997, Pages 1204-

  Jones, Colwyn M ^a,b   O'Brien, Kevin ^a   Blinkhorn, A S ^a   Rood, J P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Wigan and Bolton Health Authority   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTIST; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MOLAR TOOTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

EID: 9844257580     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7117.1204     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. National Institutes of Health. Consensus development conference for removal of third molars. J Oral Surg 1980;38:235-6.
2. Lopes V, Mumenya R, Feinmann C, Harris M. Third molar surgery: an audit of the indications for surgery, post-operative complaints and patient satisfaction Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;33:33-5.
3. Shepherd JP, Brickley M. Surgical removal of third molars. BMJ 1994;309:620-1.
4. Ismail SM, Colclough AB, Dinnen JS, Eakins D, Evans DMD, Gradwell E, et al. Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BMJ 1989;298:707-10.
5. Mercier P, Precious D. Risks and benefits of impacted third molars. Int J Oral Surg 1992;21:17-127.