Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence

Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 1997, Pages 892-900

  Santini, Massimo ^a,j   Ricci, Renato ^b   Puglisi, Andrea ^b   Mangiameli, Salvatore ^c   Proclemer, Alessandro ^d   Menozzi, Carlo ^e   De Fabrizio, Giuseppe ^f   Leoni, Giuseppe ^g   Lisi, Francesco ^h   De Seta, Francesco ⁱ  

^a SAN FILIPPO NERI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b FATEBENEFRATELLI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c GARIBALDI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d SANTA MARIA DELLA MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^e S MARIA NUOVA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^f S G MOSCATI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^g BOLOGNINI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^h CANNIZZARO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

ⁱ Medtronic Italia SpA   (Italy)

^j NONE   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

DDI DDIR pacing; Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; Sick sinus syndrome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CHRONOTROPISM; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART PACING; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SICK SINUS SYNDROME; WORK CAPACITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARRHYTHMIA; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; ATRIAL PREMATURE COMPLEXES; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY, AMBULATORY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART FUNCTION TESTS; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; RECURRENCE; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION TESTS; SICK SINUS SYNDROME; TIME FACTORS; VENTRICULAR PREMATURE COMPLEXES;

EID: 9844249668     PISSN: 00465968     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. SANTINI M, ALEXIDOU G, ANSALONE G, ET AL: Relation of prognosis in sick sinus syndrome to age, conduction defects and modes of permanent cardiac pacing. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 729-735.
2. BRANDT J, ANDERSON H, FAHRAEUS T, SCHULLER H: Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20 (3): 633-639.
3. JOHNSTON FA, ROBINSON JF, FYFE T: Exercise testing in the diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome in the elderly: implications for treatment. PACE 1987; 10: 831-838.
4. ROSENQVIST M, AREN C, KRISTENSSON BE, ET AL: Atrial rate-responsive pacing in sinus node disease. Eur Heart J 1990; 11: 537-542.
5. HATANO K, KATO R, HAYASHI H, ET AL: Usefulness of rate responsive atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. PACE 1989; 12: 16-24.
6. KAPPENBERGER I, HEPERS L: Rate-responsive dual chamber pacing. PACE 1986; 9: 987.
7. KRISTENSSON BE, ARNMAN K, RYDEN L: The haemodynamic importance of atrio-ventricular synchrony and rate increase at rest and during exercise. Eur Heart J 1985; 6: 773.
8. SUTTON R: DDDR pacing. PACE 1990; 13: 385-387.
9. KATO R, TERASAWA T, GOTOH T, SUZUKI M: Antiarrhythmic efficacy of atrial demand (AAI) and rate-responsive atrial pacing. In: SANTINI M, PISTOLESE M, ALLIEGRO A (eds): Proceedings of the International Symposium on Progress in Clinical Pacing. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, 1988; 15-24.
10. SHANDLING AH, CRUMP R, NOLASCO M, ET AL: The effect of chronic atrial overdrive suppression pacing on the incidence of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Clin Cardiol 1992; 15: 917-922.
11. BATEY IR, SWEESY MW, SCALA G, FORNEY RC: Comparison of low rate dual chamber pacing to activity responsive rate variable ventricular pacing. PACE 1990; 13: 646-652.
12. REIMOLD SC, LAMAS GA, CANTILLON CO, ANTMAN EM: Risk factors for the development of recurrent atrial fibrillation. Role of pacing and clinical variables. Am Heart J 1995; 129: 1127-1132.
13. JUTZY RV, FLORIO J, ISAEFF DM, ET AL: Comparative evaluation of rate modulated dual chamber and WIR pacing. PACE 1990; 13: 1838-1846.
14. CAPUCCI A, BORIANI G: La stimolazione DDDR. Considerazioni critiche sull'impiego clinico. Cardiostimolazione 1991; 9: 107-113.
15. LEMKE B, DRYANDER SV, JAGER D, ET AL: Aerobic capacity in rate modulated pacing. PACE 1992; 15: 1914-1918.
16. CAPUCCI A, BORIANI G, SPECCHIA S, ET AL: Evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise test of DDDR versus DDD pacing. PACE 1992; 15: 1908-1913.
17. LAMAISON D, PAGE E, AUPETIT JF, ET AL: A comparison between single atrial and dual chamber rate adaptative (AAIR and DDDR) and non adaptative AAI and DDD cardiac pacing using cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with atrial chronotropic incompetence. Eur JCPE 1993; 3: 197-204.
18. SPENCER WH III, MARKOWITZ T, ALAGONA P: Rate augmentation and atrial arrhythmias in DDDR pacing. PACE 1990; 13: 1847-1851.
19. RICCI R, PUGLISI A, FIORANELLI M, ET AL: Holter function in permanent pacemaker: what is the appliable rule? In: ADORNATO A, GALASSI A (eds): The '92 scenario on cardiac pacing. Roma, Luigi Pozzi, 1992; 392-399.
20. HARPER GR, PINA IL, KUTALEK SP: Intrinsic conduction maximizes cardio-pulmonary performance in patients with dual chamber pacemakers. PACE 1991; 14: 1787-1791.
21. WASSERMAN K, WHIPP BJ, KOYAL SN, BEAVER WL: Anaerobic threshold and respiratory gas exchange during exercise. J Appl Physiol 1973; 35: 236-243.
22. WILKOFF BL, COREY J, BLACKBURN G: A mathematical model of the cardiac chronotropic response to exercise. J Electrophysiol 1989; 3: 176-180.
23. CAPUCCI A, CAZZIN R, ZARDO F, ET AL: DDDR versus DDD and WIR pacing: a single blind randomised evaluation of symptoms and effort performance. Eur JCPE 1993; 3: 205-211.
24. WEINHOLD C, FULLE P, MARKEWITZ A, STEINBECK G: Haemodynamic and oxymetric investigations on patients under rate responsive dual chamber stimulation during exercise. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 40 (5): 273-278.
25. BRANDT J, ROSENQVIST M: Hemodynamic and anti-tachyarrhythmic effects of atrial and dual chamber rate adaptative pacing. In: SANTINI M, PISTOLESE M, ALLIEGRO A (eds): Progress in clinical pacing 1992. Mount Kisco, Futura, 1993; 179-192.
26. FLORO J, CASTELLANET M, FLORID J: DDI: a new mode for cardiac pacing. Clin Prog Pacing Electrophysiol 1984; 2: 255.
27. BANA G, LOCATELLI V, PIATTI L, ET AL: DDI pacing in the bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome. PACE 1990; 13 (3): 264-270.
28. VANERIO G, MALONEY JD, PINSKI SL, ET AL: DDIR versus WIR pacing in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. PACE 1991; 14: 1630-1638.
29. BAROLD SS: The DDI and DDIR modes of cardiac pacing. Characteristics and indications. Cardiostimolazione 1993; 11: 317-325.
30. SUTTON R, MARKOWITZ T: Toward physiological stimulation in sinus node disease. Eur JCPE 1994; 4: 126-131.
31. CLARKE M, SUTTON R, WARD D, ET AL: Recommendations for pacemaker prescription for symptomatic bradycardia. Br Heart J 1991; 66: 185-191.
32. DREIFUS LS, FISCH C, GRIFFIN JC, ET AL: Guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (Committee on pacemaker implantation). J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 1-13.
33. IRWIN M, HARRIS L, CAMERON D, ET AL: DDI pacing: indications, expectations and follow-up. PACE 1994; 17: 274-279.
34. KRUSE I, ARNMAN K, CONRADSON T-B, ET AL: A comparison of acute and long-term hemodynamic effects of ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular pacing. Circulation 1982; 65: 846-855.
35. BENDITT DG, MIANULLI M, CHURCH T, ET AL: Predicting chronotropic response of activity initiated rate-variable pacemakers: development of a simplified exercise procedure. PACE 1987; 10: 425.
36. SMEDGARD P, KRISTENSSON BE, KRUSE I, ET AL: Rate responsive pacing by means of activity sensing versus single rate ventricular pacing: a double-blind cross-over study. PACE 1987; 10: 902-915.
37. KAY GN: Quantitation of chronotropic response: comparison of methods for rate-modulating permanent pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 1533-1541.
38. BENDITT DG, WILBERT L, HANSEN R, ET AL: Late follow-up of dual chamber rate adaptative pacing. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 714-719.
39. AHERN T, NYDEGGER C, MCCORMICK DJ, ET AL: Incidence and timing of activity parameter changes in activity responsive pacing systems. PACE 1992; 15: 762-770.
40. WIENS RD, LAFIA P, MARDER CM, ET AL: Chronotropic incompetence in clinical exercise testing. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54: 74-78.