Interpreting fetal heart rate tracings: Is there a difference between labor and delivery nurses and obstetricians?

Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist

Volumn 42, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 647-650

  Beckmann, Claudia Anderson ^a,b   Van Mullem, Chris ^a   Beckmann, Charles R B ^a   Broekhuizen, Fredrik F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fetal heart rate; Fetal monitoring; Labor; Midwifery

Indexed keywords

APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; BLOOD GAS; EDUCATION; EXPERIENCE; FETUS HEART RATE; FETUS MONITORING; HUMAN; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MIDWIFE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD;

APGAR SCORE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; NURSES; OBSTETRICS; PHYSICIANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; UMBILICAL CORD;

EID: 9844235927     PISSN: 00247758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Hage ML: Interpretation of nonstress tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;153:490-495
2. Chez BF, Skurnick JH, Chez RA, et al: Interpretations of nonstress tests by obstetric nurses. Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs 1990;19:227-232
3. Helfand M, Marton K, Ueland K: Factors involved in the interpretation of fetal monitor tracings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:737-744
4. Lidegaard O, Bottcher LM, Weber T: Description, evaluation and clinical decision making according to various fetal heart rate patterns: Inter-observer and regional variability Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992;71:48-53