The role of graphical feedback about self-movement when receiving objects in an augmented environment

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 507-519

  Mason, Andrea H ^a   Mackenzie, Christine L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED ENVIRONMENT; GRAPHICAL FEEDBACK; GRAPHICAL INFORMATION; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER VISION; DATA ACQUISITION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

FEEDBACK;

EID: 9744281936     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/1054746042545319     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Arsenault, R., & Ware, C. (2000). Eye hand co-ordination with force feedback. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2000), 408-414.
2. Berthier, N. E., Clifton, R. K., Gullapalli, V., McCall, D. D., & Robin, D. (1996). Visual information and object size in the control of reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 187-197.
3. Elliott, D. (1988). The influence of visual target and limb information on manual aiming. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42 (1), 57-68.
4. Elliott, D., & Madalena, J. (1987). The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 541-559.
5. Gentilucci, M., Toni, I., Chieffi, S., & Pavesi, G. (1994). The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: A kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 447-482.
6. Graham, E. D. & MacKenzie, C. L. (1996). Physical vs virtual pointing. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1996), 292-299.
7. Jackobson, L. S., & Goodale, M. A. (1991). Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 199-208.
8. Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX (pp. 153-169). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Kuhlen, T., Kraiss, K. F., & Steffan, R. (2000). How VR-based reach to grasp experiments can help to understand movement organization within the human brain. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(4), 350-359.
10. MacKenzie, C. L., & Iberall, T. (1994) The grasping hand. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
11. MacKenzie, I. S., & Buxton, W. (1992). Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI, 1992), 219-226.
12. MacKenzie, I. S., & Ware, C. (1993). Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computer Human Interaction, 488-493.
13. Mandryk, R. L. (2000). Using the finger for interaction in virtual environments. Unpublished masters thesis, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
14. Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L., Jeannerod, M., Athenese, S., & Dugas, C. (1987). Constraints on human arm trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 365-378.
15. Mason, A. H., & Carnahan, H. G. (1999). Target viewing time and velocity effects on prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 87, 407-420.
16. Mason, A. H., & MacKenzie, C. L. (2002). The effects of visual information about self-movement on grasp forces when receiving objects in an augmented environment. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality: Haptics Symposium, 105-112.
17. Mason, A. H., Walji, M. A., Lee, E. J., & MacKenzie, C. L. (2001). Reaching movements to augmented and graphic objects in virtual environments. Proceedings of the 2001 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2001), 426-433.
18. Norman, D. A. (1968). Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychological Review, 75, 522-536.
19. Prablanc, C., Echalier, J. F., Komilis, E., & Jeannerod, M. (1979). Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target: I. Spatiotemporal characteristics of eye and hand movements and their relationships when varying the amount of visual information. Biological Cybernetics, 35, 113-124.
20. Slater, M., Sadagic, A., Usoh, M., & Schroeder, R. (2000). Small-group behavior in a virtual and real environment: A comparative study, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(1), 37-51.
21. Summers, V. A., Booth, K. S., Calvert, T., Graham, E., & MacKenzie, C. L. (1999). Calibration for augmented reality experimental testbeds. Proceedings of the 1999 ACM Symposium of Interactive 3D Graphics, 155-162.
22. Swindells, C., Dill, J. C., & Booth, K. S. (2000). System lag tests for augmented and virtual environments. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on User Interface Systems Technology, 160-170.
23. Wang, Y., & MacKenzie, C. L. (2000). The role of contextual haptic and visual constraints on object manipulation in virtual environments. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2000), 532-539.
24. Welch, R. B., Blackmon, T. T., Liu, A., Mellers, B. A., & Stark, L. W. (1996). The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual feedback and observer interactivity on the subjective sense of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(3), 263-273.
25. Wing, A. M., Turton, A., & Fraser, C. (1986). Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18(3), 245-260.
26. Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review Monograph, 3 (Whole No. 13).
27. Wu, J., & Ouhyoung, M. (1995). A 3D tracking experiment on latency and its compensation methods in virtual environments. Proceedings of the 1995 ACM Conference on User Interface Systems Technology 41-49.