Degradation of RPA 202248 [U-14C-phenyl]-α(- (cyclopropylcarbonyl)-2-(methylsulfonyl)-β-oxo-4-(trifluromethyl) benzenepropanenitrile), the primary degradation product of isoxaflutole, in an outdoor aquatic microcosm system

Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part B Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes

Volumn 39, Issue 5-6, 2004, Pages 725-736

  Rupprecht, J Kent ^a   Liu, Anne ^b   Kelly, Iain ^c   Allen, Richard ^a  

^a BAYER CORPORATION   (United States)

^b Aventis CropScience   (United States)

^c BAYER CROPSCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

Degradation; Herbicide; Isoxaflutole; Microcosm; Pesticide

Indexed keywords

DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LAKES; PHOTOLYSIS; RESERVOIRS (WATER); SOILS;

AQUEOUS PHASE; HERBICIDAL ACTIVITY; MICROCOSM SYSTEMS; MOLECULAR LEVELS;

HERBICIDES;

2 METHYLSULFONYL 4 TRIFLUOROMETHYLBENZOIC ACID; ALPHA (CYCLOPROPYLCARBONYL) 2 (METHYLSULFONYL) BETA OXO 4 (TRIFLUOROMETHYL)BENZENEPROPANENITRILE; BENZOIC ACID DERIVATIVE; HERBICIDE; ISOXAFLUTOLE; NITRILE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; FRESHWATER; PESTICIDE;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HYDROLYSIS; LAKE ECOSYSTEM; MICROCOSM; PHOTOLYSIS; POND;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 9744256980     PISSN: 03601234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/LESB-200030793     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Pallett, K.E.; Little, J.P.; Sheekey, M.; Veerasakaran, P. The mode of action of isoxaflutole: 1. physiological effects, metabolism and selectivity. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 1998, 62, 113-124.
2. Pallett, J.E. The mode of action of isoxaflutole: a case study of an emerging target site. In Herbicides and their Mechanisms of Action; Cobb, A.H., Kirkwood, R.C., Eds.; Sheffield Academic Press: Sheffield, England, 2000; 215-238.
3. Hendley, P.; Giddings, J.M., Sr. ECOFRAM quatic Report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC, 1999, http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/ecorisk/aquareport.pdf.
4. Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivision N. Chemistry: Environmental Fate; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1982.
5. Placing of the Plant Protection Products on the Market, Official Journal of the European Communities No L 172, 95/36/EC, 1995.
6. Environmental Chemistry and Fate, Guideline for Registration of Pesticides in Canada; Pest Management Regulatory Agency: Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1987.
7. Procedures for Assessing the Environmental Fate and Ecotoxicity of Pesticides; Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC-Europe), 1995.
8. Boyle, T.P.; Fairchild, J.F. The role of mesocosm studies in ecological risk analysis. Ecological Applications 1997, 7, 1099-1102.
9. Campbell, P.J.; Arnold, D.J.S.; Brock, T.C.M.; Grandy, N.J.; Heger, W.; Heimbach, F.; Maund, S.J.; Streloke, M. Guidance Document Higher Aquatic Risk Assessment for Pesticides; SETAC-Europe/OECD/EC Workshop: Lacanau Ocean, France, April 19-22, 1998.
10. Barry, M. J.; Logan, D.C. The use of temporary pound microcosms for aquatic toxicity testing: direct and indirect effects of endosulfan on community structure. Aquatic Toxicology 1998, 41, 101-124.
11. Wetzel, R.G. Limnology; 2nd Ed.; CBS College Publishing: New York, 1983.
12. Shaw, J.L.; Manning, J.P. Evaluating macroinvetebrate population and community level effects in outdoor microcosms: use of in situ bioassays and multivariate analysis. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 1996, 15, 608-617.