On the relation between magnitude and liquefaction dimension at the epicentral zone of 2001 Bhuj earthquake

Current Science

Volumn 87, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 811-817

  Thakkar, M G ^a   Goyal, Bhanu ^a  

^a Shri RR Lalan College   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 9744238198     PISSN: 00113891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Biswas, S. K., Landscape of Kutch - A morphotectonic analysis. Indian J. Earth Sci., 1974, 1, 177-190.
2. Biswas, S. K., Regional tectonic framework, structure and evolution of the western marginal basins of India. Tectonophysics, 1987, 135, 302-327.
3. Biswas, S. K. and Khattri, K. N., A geological study of earthquakes in Kutch, Gujarat, India. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2002, 60, 131-142.
4. Thakkar, M. G., Maurya, D. M., Rachna Raj and Chamyal, L. S., Morphotectonic analysis of Khari River Basin of Mainland Kachchh: Evidence for neotectonic activity along transverse fault. Bull. Indian Geol. Assoc., 2001, 34, 205-220.
5. Maurya, D. M., Thakkar, M. G. and Chamyal, L. S., Implications of transverse fault system on tectonic evolution and seismicity of Mainland Kachchh, Western India. Curr. Sci., 2003, 85, 661-667.
6. Rajendran, C. P. and Rajendran, K., Characteristics of deformation and past seismicity associated with the 1819 Kutch earthquake, Northwestern India. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2001, 91, 407-426.
7. Rajendran, C. P. and Rajendran, K., Historical constraints on previous seismic activity and morphologic changes near the source zone of the 1819 Rann of Kachchh earthquake: Further light on the penultimate event. Seismol. Res. Lett., 2002, 73, 470-479.
8. Lyell, C., Principles of Geology, Appleton & Co, New York, 1857, 11th edn, p. 834.
9. McCalpin, J. P., Palaeoseismology, Academic Press, New York, 1996, p. 588.
10. Ambraseys, N. N., Engineering seismology, earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. J. Int. Assoc. Earthquake Eng., 1988, 17, 1-105.
11. Committee on Earthquake Engineering, Liquefaction of Soils During Earthquakes, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 1985, p. 240.
12. Rajendran, K., Rajendran, C. P., Thakkar, M. G. and Tuttle, M. P., 2001 Kachchh (Bhuj) earthquake: Coseismic surface features and their significance. Curr. Sci., 2001, 80, 1397-1405.
13. Rajendran, K., Rajendran, C. P., Thakkar, M. G. and Gartia, R. K., The sand blows from the 2001 Bhuj earthquake reveal clues on past seismicity. Curr. Sci., 2002, 83, 603-610.
14. Tuttle, M. P., Hengesh, J., Tucker, K. B., Lettis, W., Deaton, S. L. and Frost, J. D., Observations and comparisons of liquefaction features and related effects induced by the Bhuj earthquake. Earthqu. Spectra (Suppl. A), 2002, 18, 79-100.
15. Seeber, L., Ragona, D., Rockwell, T., Babu, S., Briggs, R. and Wesnousky, S. G., Preliminary report on 2001 Bhuj-Kachchh earthquake submitted to the NSF, 2001.
16. McCalpin, J. P. and Thakkar, M. G., 2001 Bhuj-Kachchh Earthquake: Surface faulting and its relation with the neotectonics and regional structures, Gujarat, Western India. Ann. Geophys., 2003, 46, 937-957.