Developing regional regimes: A comparison of two metropolitan areas

Journal of Urban Affairs

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 455-477

  Hamilton, David K ^a  

^a ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METROPOLITAN AREA; PRIVATE SECTOR; REGIONAL POLICY; REGIONALISM;

CHICAGO; ILLINOIS; NORTH AMERICA; PENNSYLVANIA; PITTSBURGH; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 9744238069     PISSN: 07352166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.00210.x     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. (1992, February). Metropolitan organization: The Allegheny County case. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Allegheny Conference on Community Development. (1993). Remaking our region: Building new partnerships for change creating a new vision for growth. Pittsburgh: Author.
3. Allegheny Conference on Community Development. (1994, November). The greater Pittsburgh region: Working together to compete globally. Pittsburgh: Author.
4. Allegheny Conference on Community Development. (1999). 1999 report Pittsburgh: Author.
5. Austin, J., & McCaffrey, A. (2002). Business leadership coalitions and public-private partnerships in American cities: A business perspective on regime theory. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(1), 35-54.
6. Barnes, W. R., & Ledebur, L. C. (1998). The new regional economics: The U.S. common market and the global economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Bollens, J. C., & Schmandt, H. J. (1965). The metropolis: Its people, politics and economic life (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
8. Brandl, J., & Brooks, R. (1982). Public-private cooperation for urban revitalization: The Minneapolis and Saint Paul experience. In R. S. Fosler & R. A. Berger (Eds.), Public-private partnerships in American cities: Seven case studies (pp. 163-200). Lexington, MA: DC Heath and Company.
9. Brenner, N. (2002). Decoding the newest "metropolitan regionalism" in the USA: A critical overview. Cities, 19(1), 3-21.
10. Brown, M. (1999). Reconceptualizing public and private in urban regime theory: Governance in aids politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(1), 70-84.
11. Burns, N. (1994). The formation of American local governments: Private values in public institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Chrislip, D. D., & Larson, C. E. (1994). Collaborative leadership-how citizens and civic leaders can make a difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
13. Davis, J. S. (2002). Urban regime theory: A normative-empirical critique. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(1), 1-18.
14. DiGaetano, A., & Klemanski, J. (1991). Restructuring the suburbs: Political economy of economic development in Auburn Hills, Michigan. Journal of Urban Affairs, 13(2), 137-158.
15. DiGaetano, A., & Klemanski, J. (1993). Urban regime capacity: A comparison of Birmingham England, and Detroit, Michigan. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(4), 367-384.
16. Dodge, W. R. (1996). Regional excellence: Governing together to compete globally and flourish locally. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
17. Doig, J. (2001). Empire on the Hudson. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Downs, A. (1994). New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
19. Ferman, B. (1996). Challenging the growth machine: Neighborhood politics in Chicago and Pittsburgh. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
20. Fosler, R. S., & Berger, R. A. (Eds.). (1982). Public-private partnership in American cities: Seven case studies. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
21. Foster, K. A. (1996, March). The privatization of regionalism. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Urban Affairs Association. New York.
22. Foster, K. A. (1997). Regional impulses. Journal of Urban Affairs, 19 4), 375-403.
23. Frisch, S. (1999, March 11). Regionalism could be a tough sell. Chicago Tribune, A1.
24. Frisken, F., & Norris, D. F. (2001). Regionalism reconsidered, Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(5), 467-479.
25. Gore, A. (1999, September 28). Building livable communities. Remarks delivered by Vice-President A1 Gore. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.
26. Hamilton, D. K. (1978). Areawide government reform: A case study emphasizing the charter writing process. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
27. Hamilton, D. K. (1999). Governing metropolitan areas: Response to growth and change. New York: Garland Publishing.
28. Hamilton, D. K. (2002). Regimes and regional governance: The case of Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(4), 403-423.
29. Henton, D., Melville, J., & Walesh, K. (1997a). Grassroots leaders for a new economy: How civic entrepreneurs are building prosperous communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
30. Henton, D., Melville, J., & Walesh, K. (1997b). The new economic geography of America's regions: How the new economy makes place important today. Regionalist, 2(4), 21-25.
31. Henton, D., Melville, J., & Walesh, K., Nguyen, C., & Parr, J. (2000, October). Regional stewardship: A commitment to place. Palo Alto, CA: Alliance for Regional Stewardship.
32. Hershberg, T., Magidson, P., & Wernecke, M. L. (1992). Promoting regional cooperation in southeastern Pennsylvania. National Civic Review, 81(Fall), 418-434.
33. Hinz, G. (2001, May 14). Region's act together, but for how long? Crain's Chicago Business, p. 3.
34. Jensen, J. L., & Rogers, R. (2001). Cumulating the intellectual gold of case study research. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 235-246.
35. Jezierski, L. (1996). Pittsburgh: Partnerships in a regional city. In H. V. Savitch & R. K. Vogel (Eds.), Regional politics: America in a post city age (pp. 159-181). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Johnson, E. W. (1999). Chicago metropolis 2020. Chicago: The Commercial Club of Chicago.
37. Jonas, A. E. G. (1997). Regulating suburban politics: " Suburban-defense transition," institutional capacities, and territorial reorganization in southern California. In M. Lauria (Ed.), Reconstructing urban regime theory (pp. 206-230). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Kantor, R. M. (2000). Business coalitions as a force for regionalism. In B. Katz (Ed.), Reflections on regionalism (pp. 154-180). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
39. Kasinitz, P. (Ed.). (1995). Metropolis: Center and symbol of our times. New York: New York University Press.
40. Keating, W. D., Krumholz, N., & Perry, D. C. (Eds.). (1995). Cleveland: A metropolitan reader. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
41. Ledebur, L. C., & Barnes, W. R. (1993). All in it together: Cities, suburbs and local economic regions. Research Report. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
42. Leo, C. (1998). Regional growth management regime: The case of Portland, Oregon. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(4), 363-394.
43. Lonich, D. (1991). Metropolitics in Allegheny County: The evolution of a regional government. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.
44. Lubove, R. (Ed.). (1976). Pittsburgh. New York: New Viewpoints.
45. Lyall, K. (1982). A bicycle built-for-two: Public-private partnership in Baltimore. In R. S. Fosler & R. A. Berger (Eds.), Public-private partnerships in American cities: Seven case studies (pp. 17-58). Lexington, MA: DC Heath and Company.
46. Lyon, L. (1987). The community in urban society. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
47. Mazmanian, D., & Stanley-Jones, M. (1991). Strategies II: Reconceiving LULUs: Changing the nature and scope of locally unwanted land uses. In J. F. DiMento & L. Graymer (Eds.), Confronting regional challenges: Approaches to LULUs, growth, and other vexing governance problems (pp. 55-78). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
48. Metropolitan Planning Council. (1995, June). Creating a regional community: The case for regional cooperation. Chicago: Author.
49. Metropolitan Study Commission of Allegheny County. (1995, June 27). An urban home rule charter for Allegheny County. Pittsburgh: Author.
50. Norris, D. F. (2001). Prospects for regional governance under the new regionalism: Economic imperatives versus political impediments. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23 i](5), 557-573.
51. Orfield, M. (1997). Metro politics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC and Cambridge, MA: The Brookings Institution and The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
52. Owen, C. J., & Willbern, Y. (1985). Governing metropolitan Indianapolis: The politics of unigov. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
53. Pearson, R. (1999, February 14). Chicago now 2nd city to its suburbs in Chicago: A work in progress. Chicago Tribune, special reprint, p. 1.
54. Peirce, N. (1993). Citistates: How urban America can prosper in a competitive world. Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press.
55. Peirce, N. (1996, December 30). Citizen groups on vanguard of civic renewal. Arlington Heights Daily Herald, p. 12.
56. Pennsylvania Economy League. (1976). Pittsburgh civic system review reference data. Pittsburgh: Author.
57. Pennsylvania Economy League. (1999). 1999 annual report. Pittsburgh: Author.
58. Porter, D. R., & Wallis, A. D. (2002). Exploring ad hoc regionalism Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
59. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60. Rast, J. (2001). Manufacturing industrial decline: The politics of economic change in Chicago, 1955-1998. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23 2), 175-190.
61. Rubin, J. S., & Stankiewicz, G. M. (2001). The Los Angeles community development bank: The possible pitfalls of public-private partnerships. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(2), 133-153.
62. Rusk, D. (1993). Cities without suburbs. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
63. Savitch, H. V., Collins, D., Sanders, D., & Markham, J. P. (1993). Ties that bind: Central cities, suburbs, and the new metropolitan region. Economic Development Quarterly, 7(November), 341-357.
64. Savitch, H. V., & Vogel, R. K. (2000). Paths to new regionalism. State and Local Government Review, 32(3), 158-168.
65. Scahil, J. (1998). Allegheny conference on community development 1998 annual report. Pittsburgh: Allegheny Conference on Community Development.
66. Sellers, J. (2002, March 28). National political economies and urban regime-building. Paper presented at Urban Affairs Association annual meeting, Boston.
67. Sites, W. (1997). The limits of urban regime theory. Urban Affairs Review, 32(4), 536-558.
68. Sjoquist, D. L. (1997). The legacy of the 1996 Olympics. The Regionalist, 2(1), 12-17.
69. Stephens, G. R., & Wikstrom, N. (2000). Metropolitan government and governance: Theoretical perspectives, empirical analysis, and the future New York: Oxford University Press.
70. Stone, C. N. (1989). Urban regime politics: Governing Atlanta. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
71. Stone, C. N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(1), 1-28.
72. Stone, C. N. (1998). Regime analysis and the study of urban politics: A rejoinder. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(3), 249-260.
73. Stone, C. N., & Sanders, H. T. (Eds.). (1987). The politics of urban development. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
74. Vogel, R. K. (1992). Urban political economy. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
75. Wallis, A. D. (1993). Governance and the civic infrastructure of metropolitan regions. National Civic Review, 82(Spring), 125-137.
76. Wallis, A. D. (1994). The third wave: Current trends in regional governance. National Civic Review, 83(Summer/Fall), 289-305.
77. Weir, M. (2000). Coalition building for regionalism. In B. Katz (Ed.), Reflections on regionalism (pp. 127-153). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
78. Wheeler, S. M. (2002). The new regionalism: Key characteristics of an emerging movement. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68 3), 267-278.
79. Wood, R. C. (1961). 1400 governments. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, Doubleday.