Noncollinear and collinear relativistic density-functional program for electric and magnetic properties of molecules

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 125051-1250510

  Anton, J ^a   Fricke, B ^a   Engel, E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; ELECTRODYNAMICS; ELECTRONS; GROUND STATE; KINETIC ENERGY; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MAGNETIZATION; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; QUANTUM THEORY; RELATIVITY;

BASIS FUNCTIONS; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY (DFT);

MOLECULAR PHYSICS;

EID: 9644308543     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. D.R. Hartree, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 24, 89 (1928).
2. V. Fock, Z. Phys. 61, 126 (1930).
3. C.C.J. Roothaan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 23, 69 (1951).
4. C. Møller and M.S. Plesset, Phys. Rev. 46, 618 (1934).
5. J. Čìžek, Adv. Chem. Phys. 14, 35 (1969).
6. G.D. Purvis and R.J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 1910 (1982).
7. J.A. Pople, M. Head-Gordon, and K. Raghavachari, Chem. Phys. 98, 8718 (1993).
8. J.D. Watts, J. Gauss, and R.J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 8718 (1993).
9. M. Häuser and R. Ahlrichs, J. Comput. Chem. 10, 104 (1988).
10. I. Panas, J. Almlöf, and M.W. Feyereisen, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 40, 797 (1991).
11. M.C. Strain, G.E. Scuseria, and M.J. Frisch, Science 271, 51 (1996).
12. C. Ochsenfeld, C.A. White, and M. Head-Gordon, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 1663 (1998).
13. P.Y. Ayala and G.E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 3660 (1999).
14. M. Schütz, G. Hetzer, and H.-J. Werner, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 5691 (1999).
15. M. Schütz and H.-J. Werner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 318, 370 (2000).
16. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, 864 (1964).
17. E. van Lenthe, E.J. Baerends, and J.G. Snijders, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 4597 (1993).
18. E. van Lenthe, J.G. Snijders, and E.J. Baerends, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 6505 (1996).
19. S. Varga, E. Engel, W.-D. Sepp, and B. Fricke, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4288 (1999).
20. S. Varga, B. Fricke, H. Nakamatsu, T. Mukoyama, J. Anton, D. Geschke, A. Heitmann, E. Engel, and T. Baştuǧ, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 3499 (2000).
21. E. Engel, R.M. Dreizler, S. Varga, and B. Fricke, in Relativistic Effects in Heavy-Element Chemistry and Physics, edited by B.A. Hess (Wiley, New York, 2001).
22. E. Engel, in Relativistic Electronic Structure Theory, Part 1: Fundamentals, edited by P. Schwerdtfeger (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2002).
23. E. Engel and R.M. Dreizler, in Density Functional Theory II, edited by R.F. Nalewajski, Vol. 181 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996).
24. U. von Barth and L. Hedin, J. Phys. C 5, 1629 (1972).
25. A.K. Rajagopal and J. Callaway, Phys. Rev. B 7, 1912 (1973).
26. A.H. MacDonald and S.H. Vosko, J. Phys. C 12, 2977 (1979).
27. H. Eschrig and V.D.P. Servedio, J. Comput. Chem. 20, 23 (1999).
28. J.D. Jackson, in Klassische Elektrodynamik (de Gruyter, Berlin, 1983).
29. L. Nordström and D.J. Singh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4420 (1996).
30. L.M. Sandratskii, Adv. Phys. 47, 91 (1998).
31. C. van Wüllen, J. Comput. Chem. 23, 779 (2002).
32. J. Anton, T. Jacob, B. Fricke, and E. Engel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 213001 (2002).
33. F. Wang and W.J. Liu, J. Chin. Chem. Soc. (Taipei) 50 (3B), 597 (2003).
34. L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifschitz, Quantenelektrodynamik (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1986).
35. T. Baştuǧ, D. Heinemann, W.-D. Sepp, D. Kolb, and B. Fricke, Chem. Phys. Lett. 211, 119 (1993).
36. R.S. Mulliken, J. Chem. Phys. 23, 1833 (1955).
37. R.S. Mulliken, J. Chem. Phys. 23, 1841 (1955).
38. B.I. Dunlap, J.W.D. Connolly, and J.R. Sabin, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 3396 (1979).
39. B. Delley and D.E. Ellis, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 1949 (1982).
40. W. Liu and Ch. van Wüllen, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 2506 (2000).
41. M.V. Ramana and A.K. Rajagopal, J. Phys. C 14, 4291 (1981).
42. E. Engel, T. Auth, and R.M. Dreizler, Phys. Rev. B 64, 235126 (2001).
43. This is so-called passive rotation (Ref. [34]). An active rotation, namely, the rotation of the coordinate system leads to the same result.
44. It is also possible to use basis functions for a slightly ionized atom. But this basis cannot be used for all internuclear distances because it cannot adequately represent the molecular system at large internuclear distances.
45. L. Laaksonen, D. Sundholm, and P. Pyykkö, Comput. Phys. Rep. 4, 313 (1986).
46. L. Yang, D. Heinemann, and D. Kolb, Phys. Rev. A 48, 2700 (1993).
47. A.D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098 (1988).
48. J.P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 33, 8822 (1986).
49. S.H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys. 58, 1200 (1980).
50. M.M. Airola and M.D. Morse, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 1313 (2002).
51. P.M. Morse, Phys. Rev. 34, 57 (1929).
52. W. Liu and Ch. van Wüllen, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 3730 (1999).
53. E.M. Spain and M.D. Morse, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 4605 (1992).
54. This procedure can be also used to minimize the difference of the SCF density and model density.
55. P. Funk, Variationsrechnung und ihre Anwendung in Physik und Technik (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970).
56. W. Ludwig and C. Falter, Symmetries in Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988).
57. Only matrix elements in the squares may be not equivalent to zero. All other are.
58. P.O. Löwdin, Adv. Phys. 5, 51 (1956).