Predator-induced behaviour shifts and natural selection in field-experimental lizard populations

Nature

Volumn 432, Issue 7016, 2004, Pages 505-508

  Losos, Jonathan B ^a   Schoener, Thomas W ^b   Spiller, David A ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

BEHAVIORAL SHIFTS; EVOLUTIONARY STASIS; LIZARDS; NATURAL SHIFTS; PREDATOR-INDUCED BEHAVIOR SHIFTS;

LIVING SYSTEMS STUDIES;

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; EVOLUTION; HABITAT USE; LIZARD; NATURAL SELECTION; PREDATOR;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTION; HABITAT STRUCTURE; LIZARD; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PREDATOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; BAHAMAS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHY; LIZARDS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SELECTION (GENETICS); SURVIVAL RATE;

ANIMALIA; SQUAMATA;

EID: 9644302630     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature03039     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Wyles, J. S., Kunkel, J. G. & Wilson, A. C. Birds, behavior, and anatomical evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 4394-4397 (1983).
2. Wcislo, W. T. Behavioral environments and evolutionary change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 137-169 (1989).
3. West-Eberhard, M. J. Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 249-278 (1989).
4. Wake, D. B., Roth, G. & Wake, M. H. On the problem of stasis in organismal evolution. J. Theor. Biol. 101, 211-224 (1983).
5. Brandon, R. in The Role of Behavior in Evolution (ed. Plotkin, H. C.) 51-71 (MIT Press, Cambridge, USA, 1988).
6. Huey, R. B., Hertz, P. E. & Sinervo, B. Behavioral drive versus behavioral inertia in evolution: A null model approach. Am. Nat. 161, 357-366 (2003).
7. Eldredge, N. Macroevolutionary Dynamics: Species, Niches, & Adaptive Peaks (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989).
8. Coope, G. R. in Extinction Rates (eds lawton, J. H. & May, R. M.) 55-74 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1995).
9. Leviton, J. S. Genetics, Paleontology, and Macroevolution 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001).
10. Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991).
11. Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A. & Donoghue, M. J. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 475-505 (2003).
12. Schoener, T. W. Presence and absence of habitat shift in some widespread lizard species. Ecol. Monogr. 45, 233-258 (1975).
13. Pacala, S. W. & Roughgarden, J. Population experiments with the Anolis lizards of St. Maarten and St. Eustatius. Ecology 66, 129-141 (1985).
14. Losos, J. B. & Spiller, D. Differential colonization success and asymmetrical interactions between two lizard species. Ecology 80, 252-258 (1999).
15. Losos, J. B. Integrative approaches to evolutionary ecology: Anolis lizards as model systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25, 467-493 (1994).
16. Schoener, T. W., Spiller, D. A. & Losos, J. B. Predators increase the risk of catastrophic extinction of prey populations. Nature 412, 183-186 (2001).
17. Schoener, T. W., Spiller, D. A. & Losos, J. B. Predation on a common Anolis lizard: Can the food-web effects of a devastating predator be reversed? Ecol. Monogr. 72, 383-408 (2002).
18. Schoener, T. W., Slade, J. B. & Stinson, C. H. Diet and sexual dimorphism in the very catholic lizard genus Leiocephalus of the Bahamas. Oecologia 53, 160-169 (1982).
19. Garland, T. Jr & Losos, J. B. in Ecological Morphology: Integrative Organismal Biology (eds Wainwright, P. C. St Reilly, S.) 240-302 (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, 1994).
20. Lande, R. & Arnold, S. J. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210-1226 (1983).
21. Brodie, E. D. III, Moore, A. J. & Janzen, F. J. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 313-318 (1995).
22. Schoener, T. W. & Schoener, A. The ecological correlates of survival in some Bahamian Anolis lizards. Oikos 39, 1-16 (1982).
23. Williams, E. E. in Lizard Ecology: Studies of a Model Organism (eds Huey, R. B., Pianka, E. R. & Schoener, T. W.) 326-370 (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, USA, 1983).
24. Irschick, D. J. & Losos, J. B. Do lizards avoid habitats in which performance is submaximal?: The relationship between sprinting capabilities and structural habitat use in Caribbean anoles. Am. Nat. 154, 293-305 (1999).
25. Hurlbert, S. H. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54, 187-211 (1984).
26. Janzen, F. J. & Stern, H. S. Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Evolution 52, 1564-1571 (1998).
27. DeWitt, T. J. & Langerhans, R. B. Multiple prey traits, multiple predators: keys to understanding complex community dynamics. J. Sea Res. 49, 143-155 (2003).
28. Rundle, H. D., Vamosi, S. M. & Schluter, D. Experimental test of predation's effect on divergent selection during character displacement in sticklebacks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14943-14948 (2003).
29. Bolnick, D. I. Can intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection? An experimental test in natural populations of sticklebacks. Evolution 58, 608-618 (2004).
30. Littell, R. C., Freund, R. J. & Spector, P. C. SAS System for Linear Models 3rd edn (SAS Institute Inc., Gary, North Carolina, 1999).