Physical performance and darwinian fitness in lizards

Nature

Volumn 432, Issue 7016, 2004, Pages 502-505

  Le Galllard, Jean François ^a,c   Clobert, Jean ^a   Ferrière, Régis ^a,b  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIPED LOCOMOTION; GENES; NUTRITION; PHYSIOLOGY;

COMMON LIZARDS; DARWINIAN FITNESS; PHENOTYPES; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE;

LIVING SYSTEMS STUDIES;

FITNESS; LIZARD; LOCOMOTION; NATURAL SELECTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; DIET RESTRICTION; ENDURANCE; EVOLUTION; FITNESS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HEREDITY; INHERITANCE; LIZARD; LOCOMOTION; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; POSTNATAL DEVELOPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGING; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BODY SIZE; DIET; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; LIZARDS; MALE; PHYSICAL ENDURANCE; RUNNING; SELECTION (GENETICS); SURVIVAL RATE;

ANIMALIA; DARWINIA; LACERTA; SQUAMATA; ZOOTOCA VIVIPARA;

EID: 9644291704     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature03057     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Rupert, J. L. The search for genotypes that underlie human performance phenotypes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 136, 191-203 (2003).
2. Garland, T. J. & Losos, J. in Ecological Morphology: Integrative Organismal Biology (eds Wainwright, P. C. & Reilly, S. M.) 240-302 (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994).
3. Arnold, S. J. Morphology, performance and fitness. Am. Zool. 23, 347-361 (1983).
4. Bennett, A. F. & Huey, R. B. in Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology (eds Futuyma, D. J. & Antonovics, J.) 251-284, (1990).
5. Bouchard, C., Malina, R. M. & Pérusse, L. Human Kinetics 408 (Champaign, Illinois, 1997).
6. Irschick, D. J. Evolutionary approaches for studying functional morphology: examples from studies of performance capacity. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42, 278-290 (2002).
7. Irschick, D. J. & Garland, T. J. Integrating function and ecology in studies of adaptation: investigations of locomotor capacity as a model system. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32, 367-396 (2001).
8. Garland, T. J. Physiological correlates of locomotory performances in a lizard: an allometric approach. Am. J. Physiol 247, R806-R815 (1984).
9. Clobert, J. et al. Trade-offs in phenotypic traits: endurance at birth, growth, survival, predation and susceptibility to parasitism in a lizard, Lacerta vivipara. Funct. Ecol. 14, 675-684 (2000).
10. Le Gaillard, J.-F., Ferrière, R. & Clobert, J. Mother-offspring interactions affect natal dispersal in a lizard. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 1163-1169 (2003).
11. Sorci, G., Swallow, J. G., Garland, T. J. & Clobert, J. Quantitative genetics of locomotor speed and endurance in the lizard Lacerta vivipara. Physiol. Zool. 68, 698-720 (1995).
12. Lorenzon, P., Clobert, J. & Massot, M. The contribution of phenotypic plasticity to adaptation in Lacerta vivipara. Evolution 55, 392-404 (2001).
13. Jayne, B. C. & Bennett, A. F. Selection of locomotor performance capacity in a natural population of garter snakes. Evolution 44, 1204-1229 (1990).
14. Sorci, G. & Clobert, J. Natural selection on hatchling body size and mass in two environments in the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara). Evol. Ecol. Res. 1, 303-316 (1999).
15. Janzen, F. J., Tucker, J. K. & Paukstis, G. L. Experimental analysis of an early life-history stage: selection on size of hatchling turtles. Ecology 81, 2290-2304 (2000).
16. Cureton, K. J. & Sparling, P. B. Distance running performance and metabolic responses to running in men and women with excess weight experimentally equated. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 12, 288-294 (1980).
17. Swallow, J. G., Koteja, P., Carter, P., A. & Garland, T. Jr. Food consumption and body composition in mice selected for high wheel-running activity. J. Comp. Physiol B 171, 651-659 (2001).
18. Khodadoost, M., Pilorge, T. & Ortega, A. Variations de la densité et de la taille corporelle en fonction de la composition du peuplement de proies de trois populations de lézards vivipares du Mont Lozère. Revue d'Ecologie (Terre Vie) 42, 193-201 (1987).
19. Price, T. D. St Grant, P. R. Life history traits and natural selection for small body size in a population of Darwin's finches. Evolution 38, 483-494 (1984).
20. Riska, B. Composite traits, selection response, and evolution. Evolution 43, 1172-1191 (1986).
21. Le Galliard, J.-F., Le Bris, M. & Clobert, J. Timing of locomotor impairment and shift in thermal preferences during gravidity in a viviparous lizard. Funct. Ecol. 17, 877-885 (2003).
22. Huey, R. B., Bennett, A. F., John-Alder, H. & Nagy, K. A. Locomotor capacity and foraging behaviour of Kalahari lacertid lizards. Anim. Behav. 32, 41-50 (1984).
23. White, G. C. & Burnham, K. P. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46, 120-138 (1999).
24. Avery, R. A. Estimates of food consumption by the lizard Lacerta vivipara Jacquin. J. Anim. Ecol. 40, 351-365 (1971).
25. Massot, M., Clobert, J., Lecomte, J. & Barbault, R. Incumbent advantage in common lizards and their colonizing ability. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 431-440 (1994).
26. Rice, W. R. & Gaines, S. D. 'Heads I win, tails you lose': testing directional alternative hypotheses in ecological and evolutionary research. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 235-237 (1994).
27. Falconer, D. S. An Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (Longman, London, 1989).
28. Littell, R. C., Millinken, G. A., Stroup, W. W. & Wolfinger, R. D. SAS Systems for Mixed Models (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 1996).
29. Schluter, D. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42,849-861 (1988).
30. Janzen, F. J. & Stern, H. S. Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Evolution 52, 1564-1571 (1998).