From progress to regression: Biomedical research funding

Journal of Clinical Investigation

Volumn 114, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 872-876

  Mandel, H George ^a   Vesell, Elliot S ^b  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; BUDGET; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POLITICS; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 9644289442     PISSN: 00219738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1172/JCI23245     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Lederman, L.M. 1992. The advancement of science (1992). Science. 256:1119-1124.
2. National Science Board. 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Volume 1, NSB 04-1; Volume 2, NSB 04-1A. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind04/ start.htm.
3. National Science Board. 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Volume 1, NSB 04-1; Volume 2, NSB 04-1A. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind04/ start.htm.
4. Pardes, H., et al. 1999. Effects of medical research on health care and the economy. Science. 283:36-37.
5. NIH. 2004. The NIH almanac - appropriations, Section 2. http://www.nih.gov/about/almanac/index.html.
6. NIH. 2004. Summary of the FY 2005 president's budget. http://www.nih.gov/about/director/budgetrequest/index.htm.
7. Office of Science Policy and Planning. 2004. BRPDI overview of annual update. http://ospp.od.nih.gov/ecostudies/brdpi_fy2003.asp.
8. Korn, D., et al. 2002. The NIH budget in the "post-doubling" era. Science. 296:1401-1402.
9. Mandel, H.G., Woosley, R.L., and Vesell, E.S. 1992. Biomedical research funding: view of the National Caucus of Basic Biomedical Science Chairs. FASEB J. 6:3133-3134.
10. Mandel, H.G., and the National Caucus of Basic Biomedical Science Chairs. 1997. Downsizing of basic science departments in U.S. medical schools: perception of their chairs. Acad. Med. 72:894-900.
11. NIH. Office of Extramural Research. 2004. NIH competing and non-competing RPG awards. Ptoportion of awards devoted to specific research mechanisms. Fiscal years 1998-2003. http://www.grants.nih.gov/grants/award/trends/ ttlamtprop9803.htm.
12. NIH. 2004. Competing applications by type of grant and activity, fiscal years 1970-2003. http://www.grants.nih.gov/grants/award/awardindex.htm.
13. Mandel, H.G. 1994. Funding of newly submitted NIH grant applications. Science. 266:1789.
14. Mandel, H.G. 1995. Funding of NIH grant applications: update. Science. 269:13-14.
15. Mandel, H.G., and Vesell, E.S. 1999. Likelihood of NIH extramural funding. Science. 285:1674-1676.
16. Mandel, H.G., and Vesell, E.S. 2001. NIH budgets grow, but not R01 success rates. Science. 294:53-57.
17. Goldman, E., and Marshall, E. 2002. NIH grantees: where have all the young ones gone? Science. 298:40-41.
18. Nathan, D.G., and Wilson, J.D. 2003. Clinical research and the NIH - a report card. N. Engl. J. Med. 349:1860-1865.
19. Sung, N.S., et al. 2003. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 289:1278-1287.
20. Zerhouni, E.A. 2003. The NIH roadmap. Science. 302:63-72.
21. Leshner, A.I. 2003. Don't let ideology trump science. Science. 302:1479.
22. Marshall, E. 2003. Sex-scudy grants scrape through. Science. 301:289.
23. Kaiser, J. 2003. NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list. Science. 302:758.
24. Thurgood, L. 2004. Graduate enrollment in science and engineering fields reaches new peak; first-time enrollment of foreign students declines. InfoBrief. NSF 04-326. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/infbrief/ nsf04326/start.htm.
25. Mervis, J. 2004. Is the U.S. brain gain faltering? Science. 304:1278-1282.
26. Zerhouni, E.A. 2004. Global workforce bolsters U.S. science. Science. 304:1211.
27. Korn, D. 1998. Academic medical centers: whence they came, where they went. J. Soc. Gynecol. Investig. 5:227-236.
28. Research!America. 2004. Americans value research designed to improve health care. http://www. researchamerica.org/polldata/AHRQrelatedslides_ files/v3_document.htm.