|
Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 399-404
|
The postoperative analgesic efficacy of wound instillation with ropivacaine 0.1% versus ropivacaine 0.2%
|
Author keywords
Analgesia; hysterectomy; local anesthetic instillation; patient controlled; postoperative; ropivacaine; salpingo oophorectomy
|
Indexed keywords
MORPHINE;
PETHIDINE;
ROPIVACAINE;
ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM;
DRUG EFFICACY;
DRUG INSTILLATION;
EPIDURAL CATHETER;
FEMALE;
GENERAL ANESTHESIA;
HUMAN;
MEDICAL ASSESSMENT;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
PATIENT CODING;
PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA;
POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA;
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
SURGICAL WOUND;
AMIDES;
ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED;
ANALGESICS, OPIOID;
ANESTHETICS, LOCAL;
DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
HYSTERECTOMY;
INSTILLATION, DRUG;
MIDDLE AGED;
MORPHINE;
OVARIECTOMY;
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
|
EID: 9644287881
PISSN: 09528180
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.07.002 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (18)
|
References (7)
|