Using the BDI architecture to produce autonomous characters in virtual worlds

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2792, Issue , 2003, Pages 197-201

  Torres, Jorge A ^a   Nedel, Luciana P ^a   Bordini, Rafael H ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; CHARACTER RECOGNITION; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; VIRTUAL REALITY; PROGRAM INTERPRETERS; SPECIFICATIONS;

BELIEF-DESIRE-INTENTION (BDI) THEORY; COGNITIVE ANIMATIONS; EMOTIONS; VIRTUAL CHARACTERS; AGENT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; ANIMATED CHARACTERS; ARTICULATED MODELS; AUTONOMOUS CHARACTERS; BELIEF-DESIRE-INTENTION MODELS; CHARACTER ANIMATION; COMPUTER ANIMATION; HIGH LEVEL SPECIFICATION;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; INTELLIGENT VIRTUAL AGENTS;

EID: 9644279610     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39396-2_32     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Rao, A. S. 1996. AgentSpeak(L): BDI Agents Speak Out in a Logical Computable Language. In Proc. MAAMAW-96. Springer Verlag, LNAI 1038, pp. 42-55.
2. Rao, A. S. and Georgeff, M. P. 1995. BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS'95), San Francisco, CA, 312-319.
3. Perlin, K. and Goldberg, A. 1996. IMPROV: A System for Scripting Interactive Actors in Virtual Worlds. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH 96, 205-216.
4. Badler, N. I., Bindiganavale, R., Allbeck, J. M., Schuler, W., Zhao, L. and Palmer, M. 2000. Parameterized Action Representation for Virtual Human Agents. Embodied Conversational Characters, Cambridge, MA, MITPress.
5. Funge, J., Tu, X. and Terzopoulos, D. 1999. Cognitive Modeling: Knowledge, Reasoning and Planning for Intelligent Characters. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH 99, Los Angeles, CA.
6. Bates, J., Loyall, A. B. and Reilly, W. S. 1992. An Architecture for Action, Emotion and Social Behavior. Technical Report CMU-CS-92-144, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
7. Rousseau, D. and Hayes-Roth, B. 1997. Improvisational Synthetic Actors with Flexible Personalities. Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Report No. KSL 97-10, Stanford, CA.
8. Marsella, S. and Gratch, J. 2002. A Step Towards Irrationality: Using Emotion to Change Belief. In Proc. 1st Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, Italy.
9. Maciel, A., Nedel, L. P. and Freitas, C.M.D.S. 2002. Anatomy Based Joint Models for Virtual Humans Skeletons. In: IEEE COMPUTER ANIMATION, Geneva, Switzerland.
10. Bordini, R. H., Bazzan, A. L. C., Jannone, R. O., Basso, D. M., Vicari, R. M. and Lesser, V. R. 2002. AgentSpeak(XL): Efficient Intention Selection in BDI Agents via Decision-Theoretic Task Scheduling. In Proc. 1st Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, Italy.
11. Bordini, R. H. and Moreira Á. F. 2002. Proving the asymmetry thesis principles for a BDI agent-oriented programming language. In Proc. of CLIMA-02, held with FLoC'02, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 70(5).
12. Rao, A. S. and Georgeff, M. P. 1998. Decision procedures for BDI logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):293-343.