The clinical autonomy of community pharmacists in England. 1. Designing and testing a survey instrument

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 223-229

  Magirr, Peter ^a,d   Grimsley, Mike ^a   Ottewill, Roger ^b   Noyce, Peter ^c  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; EMPLOYEE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; PHARMACIST; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 9644274142     PISSN: 09617671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1211/0022357044977     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Laffin M. Professionalism and policy: the role of the professions in the central-local government relationship. Aldershot: Gower; 1986.
2. Freidson E. Professionalism reborn: theory, prophecy and policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1994. Chapter 9, pp 149-68.
3. Freidson E. Profession of medicine: a study in the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Harper and Row; 1970.
4. Moore W. The professions: roles and rules. New York: Russell Sage; 1970.
5. Dunning A. Status of the doctor - present and future. Lancet 1999;354(suppl. IV):SIV18.
6. Holloway S, Jewson N, Mason D. Reprofessionalization or occupational imperialism?: some reflections on pharmacy in Britain. Soc Sci Med 1986;23:323-32.
7. Magirr P, Ottewill R. Measuring the employee/contractor balance. Pharm J 1995;254:876-79.
8. Ottewill R, Magirr P. Changes in the ownership of community pharmacies: policy implications. Public Money Manage 1998;19:39-44.
9. Medicines, ethics and practice. A guide for pharmacists, London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 2002. p 84.
10. Harding G, Taylor K. Pharmacy as a profession. In: K Taylor, Harding G, editors. Pharmacy practice. London: Taylor and Francis; 2001.
11. Pharmacy in the future. London: Department of Health; 2000.
12. Elston M. The politics of professional power: medicine in a changing health service. In: Gabe J, Clanan M, Bury M, editors. The sociology of the health service, London and New York: Routledge; 1991.
13. Magirr P, Grimsley M, Ottewill R, Grimsley M, Noyce P. The clinical autonomy of community pharmacists in England. 2: Key findings. Int J Pharm Pract 2004;12:231-8.
14. Smith F. Health services research methods in pharmacy - focus groups and observation studies. Int J Pharm Pract 1998;6:229-42.
15. Bissell P, Ward PR, Noyce P. Appropriateness measurement: application to advice giving in community pharmacy. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:343-59.
16. Alexander C, Weisman C, Chase G. Determinants of staff nurses' perceptions of autonomy within different clinical contexts. Nurs Res 1982;31:48-52.
17. Wade G. Professional nurse autonomy concept analysis and application to nursing education. J Adv Nurs 1999;30:310-18.
18. Kitzinger J. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995;311:299-302.
19. Hassell K, Hibbert D. The use of focus groups in pharmacy research: processes and practicalities. J Soc Adm Pharm 1996;13:169-177.
20. Larkin G. Occupational monopoly and modern medicine. London: Tavistock; 1983.
21. Magirr P, Ottewill R, Grimsley M, Noyce PR. Professional autonomy in community pharmacy. Pharm J 1999;263:R49.
22. Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994.
23. Proctor M. Measuring attitudes. In: Gilbert N, editor. Researching social life, 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2001.
24. Bowling A. Research methods in health. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1997.