Fraud and other misconduct in biomedical research

British Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 325-328

  Illingworth, R ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CULTURAL FACTOR; CURRICULUM; DATA ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; EMPLOYMENT; FORGERY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PUBLICATION;

EID: 9644265593     PISSN: 02688697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02688690400004795     Document Type: Editorial

References (25)

1. Lock S. Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain? BMJ 1988;297:1531-5.
2. Anonymous. Dealing with deception. Lancet 1996;347:843.
3. Farthing M. An editor's response to fraudsters. BMJ 1998;316:1729-31.
4. Farthing M, Horton R, Smith R. Research misconduct: Britain's failure to act. BMJ 2000;321:1485-6.
5. Lock S. Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud. BMJ 1995;310:547-8.
6. Dyer C. Consultant struck off over research fraud. BMJ 1997;315:205.
7. Ferriman A. Consultant suspended for research fraud. BMJ 2000;321:1429.
8. Rennie D, Gunsalus CK. Regulations on scientific misconduct: lessons from the US experience. In Lock S, Wells F, Farthing M, eds, Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research, 3rd edn. London: BMJ Books 2001;13-31.
9. Farthing M. Research misconduct: an editor's view. In Lock S, Wells F, Farthing M, eds, Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research, 3rd edn. London: BMJ Books 2001; 244-56.
10. Gwilym SE, Swan MC, Giele H. One in 13 'original' articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications. JBJS 2004;76:743-5.
11. Schein M, Paludugu R. Redundant surgical publications: tip of the iceberg? Surgery 2001;129:655-61.
12. Bailey BJ. Duplicate publications in the field of otolaryngology: head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:211-6.
13. Lock S. Research misconduct 1974-1990: an imperfect history. In Lock S, Wells F, Farthing M, eds, Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research, 3rd edn. London: BMJ Books 2001;51-63.
14. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Ann Int Med 1997;126:36-47.
15. Smith R. Misconduct in research: editors respond. BMJ 1997;315:201-2.
16. White C., ed. The COPE Report 2002. Committee on Publication Ethics. London: BMJ Books 2002.
17. Smith R. The need for a national body for research misconduct. BMJ 1998;316:1686-7.
18. Lachmann P. The Research Integrity Initiative: progress report. In White C, ed., The COPE Report 2002. Committee on Publication Ethics. London: BMJ Books 2002:8-12.
19. Mayor S. New governance framework for NHS research aims to stop fraud. BMJ 2000;321:725.
20. Tomlinson S, Catto GRD. Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research: how should we respond? Roy Coll Phys Edin 2000;30 suppl 7:18-21.
21. Kalichman MW, Friedman PJ. A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics. Acad Med 1992;67:769-75.
22. Anderson RE, Obenshain SS. Cheating by students: findings, reflections and remedies. Acad Med 1994;69:323-32.
23. Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998. London: Stationery Office.
24. MRC Policy and Procedure for Inquiring Into Allegations of Scientific Misconduct. London: MRC December 1997.
25. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. Causes, investigation and prevention. London: Royal College of Physicians of London, 1991.