Photosynthetic plasticity of Phalaenopsis in response to different light environments

Journal of Plant Physiology

Volumn 161, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1259-1268

  Lin, Ming Ju ^a   Hsu, Ban Dar ^a  

^a NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Chlorophyll fluorescence; Light environment; Phalaenopsis; Photosynthetic production

Indexed keywords

LIGHT; MIRRORS; PLANTS (BOTANY); PLASTICITY; STARCH;

GROWTH IRRADIANCE; PHOTOSYNTHETIC CAPACITY; PHOTOSYNTHETIC PRODUCTION;

PHOTOSYNTHESIS;

MIRRORS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANTS; PLASTICITY;

ORCHIDACEAE; PHALAENOPSIS; PHALAENOPSIS AMABILIS;

EID: 9644258905     PISSN: 01761617     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Björkman O. Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Zieger H, editors. Encyclopedia of plant physiology. physiological plant ecology I, vol. 12. Berlin: Springer; 1981. p. 57-107.
2. Chen WH, Wang YT. Phalaenopsis orchid culture. Taiwan Sugar 1996;43:11-6.
3. Chow WS, Adamson HY, Anderson JM. Photosynthetic acclimation of Tradescantia-albiflora to growth irradiance: lack of adjustment of light-harvesting components and its consequence. Physiol Plant 1991;81:175-82.
4. Coombs J, Hind G, Leegood RC, Tieszen LL, Vonshak A. Analytical techniques. In: Coombs J, Hall DO, Long SP, Scurlock JMO, editors. Techniques in bioproductivity and photosynthesis. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1985. p. 219-28.
5. Fetene M, Lee HSJ, Lüttge U. Photosynthetic acclimation in a terrestrial CAM Bromeliad, Bromelia humilis Jacq. New Phytol 1990;114:399-406.
6. Greer DH. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in dwarf bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) leaves: effect of sink-limitations induced by changes in daily photon receipt. Planta 1998;205:189-96.
7. Haslam R, Borland A, Maxwell K, Griffiths H. Physiological responses of the CAM epiphyte Tillandsia usneoides L. (Bromeliaceae) to variations in light and water supply. J Plant Physiol 2003;160:627-34.
8. Kubota S, Yoneda K. Effects of light intensity on developmental and nutritional status of Phalaenopsis. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci 1993;62:173-9.
9. Kubota S, Yoneda K. Effects of light intensity preceding day/night temperatures on the sensitivity of Phalaenopsis to flower. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci 1993;62:595-600.
10. Lee N, Guo WJ. Photosynthesis in Phalaenopsis amabilis. In: Lee GJ, editor. Proceedings of the Academic Cooperation Conferences on Technology Development, vol. 1. Taipei, 2000. p. 11-5.
11. Lootens P, Heursel J. Irradiance, temperature and carbon dioxide enrichment affect photosynthesis in Phalaenopsis hybrids. Hortscience 1998;33:1183-5.
12. Maxwell K, Marrison JL, Leech RM, Griffiths H, Horton P. Chloroplast acclimation in leaves of Guzmania monostachia in response to high light. Plant Physiol 1999;121:89-96.
13. Murchie EH, Horton P. Acclimation of photosynthesis to irradiance and spectral quality in British plant species: chlorophyll content, photosynthetic capacity and habitat preference. Plant Cell Environ 1997;20:438-48.
14. Ota K, Morioka K, Yamanoto Y. Effects of leaf age, inflorescence, temperature, light intensity and moisture conditions on CAM photosynthesis in Phalaenopsis. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci 1991;60:125-32.
15. Pearcy RW. Acclimation to sun, shade. In: Raghavendra AS, editor. Photosynthesis: a comprehensive treatise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 250-63.
16. Rosenqvist E, van Kooten O. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a general description and nomemclature. In: DeEll JR, Toivonen PMA, editors. Practical applications of chlorophyll fluorescence in plant biology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. p. 31-77.
17. Sassenrath-Cole GF. Dependence of canopy light distribution on leaf and canopy structure for two cotton (Gossypium) species. Agr Forest Meteorol 1995;77:55-72.
18. Skillman JB, Winter K. High photosynthetic capacity in a shade-tolerant crassulacean acid metabolism plant: implication for sunfleck use, nonphotochemical energy dissipation, and susceptibility to photoinhibition. Plant Physiol 1997;113:441-50.
19. Valladares F, Pearcy RW. The geometry of light interception by shoots of Heteromeles arbutifolia: morphological and physiological consequences for individual leaves. Oecologia 1999;121:171-82.
20. Wang YT. Phalaenopsis orchid light requirement during the induction of spiking. Hortscience 1995;30:59-61.
21. Willcott J, Herbert SJ, Zhi YL. Leaf area display and light interception in short-season soybeans glycine-max. Field Crop Res 1984;9:173-82.
22. Winter K, Smith JAC. An introduction to crassulacean acid metabolism. Biochemical principles and ecological diversity. In: Winter K, Smith JAC, editors. Crassulacean acid metabolism. Biochemistry, ecophysiology and evolution. Berlin: Springer; 1996. p. 1-13.
23. 2 availability. Oecologia 1992;91:47-51.