Trust and shared decision-making: An emerging research agenda

Health Expectations

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 271-273

  Entwistle, Vikki ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETENCE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING; TRUST;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RESEARCH; TRUST;

EID: 9644253081     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00304.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Kraetschmer N, Sharpe N, Urowitz S, Deber RB. How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in shared decision-making? Health Expectations. 2004; 7: 317-326.
2. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Self reported use of shared decision-making among breast cancer specialists and perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing this approach. Health Expectations, 2004; 7: 338-348.
3. Baier A. Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 1986; 96: 231-260.
4. Jones K. Trust as an affective attitude. Ethics, 1996; 107: 4-25.
5. Rogers WA. Is there a moral duty for doctors to trust patients? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2002; 28: 77-80.
6. Thom DH, Campbell B. Patient-physician trust: an exploratory study. Journal of Family Practice, 1997; 44: 169-176.