Toward achieving universal usability for older adults through multimodal feedback

Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability, CCU 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 46-53

  Emery, V Kathlene ^a   Edwards, Paula J ^a   Jacko, Julie A ^a   Moloney, Kevin P ^a   Barnard, Leon ^a   Kongnakorn, Thitima ^a   Sainfort, François ^a   Scott, Ingrid U ^b  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory; Computer use; Experience; Haptic; Multimodal; Older adults; Visual

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; HAPTIC INTERFACES; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

AUDITORY; COMPUTER USE; EXPERIENCE; HAPTIC; MULTIMODAL; OLDER FAULTS; VISUAL;

MODAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 9544254269     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/957205.957214     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Akamatsu, M., MacKenzie, I. S., & Hasbroucq, T. (1995). A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. Ergonomics, 38(4), 816-827.
2. Akamatsu M., & Sato, S. (1994). A multi-modal mouse with tactile and force feedback. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 40, 443-453.
3. Brewster, S. A. (1998). Sonically-enhanced drag and drop. Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD'98), Glasgow, UK, 1-7.
4. Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., Ownby, R., Roth, D. L., and Nair, S., 2001, Examining Age Differences in Performance of a Complex Search and Retrieval Task. Psychology and Aging, 16(4), 564-579.
5. Ellis, R. D., & Kurniawan S. (2000). Increasing the usability of online information for older users: A case study in participatory design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2(12), 263-276.
6. Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2000). Influence of training and experience on skill acquisition and maintenance in older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 8, 373-378.
7. Field, A. (2000). Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows (Great Britain: The Cromwell Press, Ltd.)
8. Fraser, J., & Gutwin, C. (2000). A Framework of Assistive Pointers for Low Vision Users. Fourth Annual International ACM/SIGCAPH Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS 2000), Arlington, VA, pp. 9-16.
9. Gaver, W. (1989) The SonicFinder: An interface that uses auditory icons. Human Computer Interaction, 4(1), 67-94.
10. Hawthorn, D. (2000). Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interacting with Computers, 12, 507-528.
11. Hilz, M. J., Axelrod, F. B., Hermann, K., Haertl, U, Duetsch, M., & Neundörfer, B. (1998). Normative values of vibratory perception in 530 children, juveniles and adults. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 159, 219-225.
12. Jacko, J. A., Rosa, R. H., Jr., Scott, I. U., Pappas, C. J., & Dixon, M. A. (2000). Visual impairment: The use of visual profiles in evaluations of icon use in computer-based tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12(1), 151-164.
13. Jacko, J. A., Scott, I. U., Sainfort, F., Barnard, L., Edwards, P. J., Emery, V. K., Kongnakorn, T., Moloney, K. P., & Zorich, B. S. (2003). Older adults and visual impairment: What do exposure times and accuracy tell us about performance gains associated with multimodal feedback? Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2003), 5(1) (pp. 33-40). Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA.
14. Jacko, J. A., Scott, I. U., Sainfort, F., Moloney, K. P., Kongnakorn, T., Zorich, B. S., & Emery, V. K. (2003). Effects of multimodal feedback on the performance of older adults with normal and impaired vision. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 2615, 3-22.
15. MacKenzie, I. S., Sellen, A., & Buxton, W. A. S. (1991). A comparison of input devices in elemental pointing and dragging tasks. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Reaching through Technology (CHI'91), New Orleans, 161-166.
16. McGee, M. R., Gray, P. D., & Brewster, S. A. (2001). The effective combination of haptic and auditory textural information. In S. A. Brewster & R. Murray-Smith (Eds.), Haptic-Human-Computer Interaction (Springer LNCS), 2058, pp. 118-126.
17. Mead, S. E., Sit, R. A., Rogers, W. A., Jamieson, B. A., & Rousseau, G. K. (2000). Influences of general computer experience and age on library database search performance. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19(2), 107-123.
18. Meyer, J. (2001). Age: 2000. Census 2000 Brief. C2KBR/01-12, US Census Bureau, USA.
19. Morrell, R. W., Mayhorn, C. B., & Bennett, J. (2000). A survey of World Wide Web use in middle-aged and older adults. Human Factors, 42(1), 175-182.
20. Newburger, E. C. (2001). Home Computers and Internet Use in the United States: August 2000. Current Population Reports, Series P23-207, US Census Bureau, USA.
21. Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. (2002). Human information processing: Some implications for human-computer interaction. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 35-51. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Rogers, W. A. (1997). Individual differences, aging, and human factors: An overview. In A. D. Fisk & W. A. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of Human Factors and the Older Adult, pp. 151-170. London: Academic Press.
23. Sanders, M. S., & McCormick, E. J. (1993). Human Factors in Engineering and Design, pp. 160-219. New York: McGraw Hill.
24. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human Computer Interaction. (Massachusetts: Addison Wesley).
25. Soto-Faraco, S., Lyons, J., Gazzaniga, M., Spence, C., & Kingstone, A. (2002). The ventriloquist in motion: Illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 139-146.
26. Tiffin, J., & Asher, E.J. (1948). The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and Studies of Reliability and Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 234-247.
27. Van Beers, R. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Haggard, P. (2002). When feeling is more important that seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Current Biology, 12, 834-837.
28. Van der Veer, G. C., and Melguizo, M. (2002). Mental Models. In J. A. Jacko and A. Sears (Eds), The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, pp.52-80. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Vitense, H. S., Jacko, J. A., & Emery, V. K. (2003). Multimodal feedback: An assessment of performance and mental workload. Ergonomics, 46(1-3), 68-87.
30. Vitense, H. S., Jacko, J. A., and Emery, V. K. (2002). Foundations for improved interaction by individual with visual impairments through multimodal feedback. Universal Access in the Information Society (UAIS), 2(1), 76-87.
31. nd Ed.). (Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center).
32. Wickens, C.D. (1984) Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of Attention. 63-102. New York, Academic Press.