More mercenary mate selection? Comment on Sweeney and Cancian (2004) and Press (2004)

Journal of Marriage and Family

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1034-1037

  England, Paula ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 9544228300     PISSN: 00222445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00075.x     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Bernhardt, A., Morris, M., Handcock, M. S., & Scott, M. A. (2001). Divergent paths: Economic mobility in the new American labor market. New York: Russell Sage.
2. Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (1995). The winner-take-all society: Why the few at the top get so much more than the rest of us. New York: Free Press.
3. Jargowsky, P. A. (1996). Take the money and run: Economic segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas. American Sociological Review, 61, 984-998.
4. Juhn, C., & Murphy, K. M. (1997). Wage inequality and family labor supply. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 72-79.
5. Press, J. E. (2004). Cute butts and housework: A gynocentric theory of assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1029-1033.
6. Sweeney, M. M., & Cancian, M. (2004). The changing importance of White women's economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1015-1028.