Proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell-powered vehicle performance using direct-hydrogen fueling and on-board methanol reforming

Energy

Volumn 29, Issue 12-15 SPEC. ISS., 2004, Pages 2317-2330

  Boettner, Daisie D ^a   Moran, Michael J ^b  

^a UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY   (United States)

^b Ohio State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUEL ECONOMY; HYDROGEN FUELS; METHANOL; REFORMING REACTIONS; VEHICLES;

METHANOL REFORMING; PROTON EXCHANGE MEMBRANE (PEM);

FUEL CELLS;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; FUEL CONSUMPTION; HYDROGEN;

EID: 9544223226     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.026     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Hirschenhofer JH, Stauffer DB, Engleman RR, Klett MG. Fuel cell handbook. 4th ed. DOE/FETC-99/1076. 1998.
2. Appleby AJ, Foulkes FR. Fuel cell handbook. Malabar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company; 1993.
3. Springer TE, Zawodzinski TA, Gottesfeld S. Polymer electrolyte fuel cell model. Journal of Electrochemistry Society 1991;138(8):2334-42.
4. Srinivasan S, Velev OA, Parthasarathy A, Mando DJ, Appleby AJ. High energy efficiency and high power density proton exchange membrane fuel cells - electrode kinetics and mass transport. Journal of Power Sources 1991;36:299-320.
5. Amphlett JC, Baumert RM, Mann RF, Peppley BA, Roberge PR. Performance modeling of the ballard mark IV solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell, I and II. Mechanistic model development. Journal of Electrochemistry Society 1995;142(1):1-8 and 9-15.
6. Mann RF, Amphlett JC, Hooper MAI, Jensen HM, Peppley BA, Roberge PR. Development and application of a generalised steady-state electrochemical model for a PEM fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources 2000;86:173-80.
7. Lee JH, Lalk TR, Appleby AJ. Modeling electrochemical performance in large scale proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks. Journal of Power Sources 1998;70:258-68.
8. Eaton B, von Spakovsky MR, Ellis MW, Nelson DJ, Olsommer B, Siegel N. One-dimensional, transient model of heat, mass, and charge transfer in a proton exchange membrane. Proceedings of the ASME Advanced Energy Systems Division International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, vol. 41, New York, NY, November 11-16. 2001, p. 429-40.
9. Ogden JM, Steinbugler MM, Kreutz TG. A comparison of hydrogen, methanol and GASOLINE as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: implications for vehicle design and infrastructure development. Journal of Power Sources 1999;79:143-68.
10. Rodatz P, Guzzella L, Pellizzari L. System design and supervisory controller development for a fuel-cell vehicle. Proceedings, 1st International Federation of Automatic Control Conference on Mechatronic Systems, 1, Darmstadt, Germany, September 18-20. 2000, p. 173-8.
11. Johansson K, Alvfors P. Steady-state model of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell system for automotive applications. In: Hirs GG, editor. Proceeding of the International Symposium ECOS 2000, From Thermo-economics to Sustainability, Part 1. Nederland: Universiteit Twente; 2000, p. 725-36.
12. Barbir F, Balasubramanian B, Neutzler J. Trade-off design analysis of operating pressure and temperature in PEM fuel cell systems. Proceedings, ASME Advanced Energy Systems Division, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, vol. 39, Nashville, Tennessee, November 14-19. 1999, p. 305-15.
13. Friedman DJ. Maximizing Direct-Hydrogen PEM Fuel Cell Vehicle Efficiency - Is Hybridization Necessary? SAE Publication Fuel Cell Power for Transportation (SP-1425), Paper 1999-01-0530, 1999, p. 9-17.
14. Geyer HK, Ahluwalia RK. GCtool for Fuel Cell Systems Design and Analysis: User Documentation, Report no. ANL-98/8, Argonne, Illinois: Argonne National Laboratory, for US Department of Energy under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38, 1998.
15. Rizzoni G, Guezennec Y, Brahma A, Wei X, Miller T. VP-SIM: A Unified Approach to Energy and Power Flow Modeling Simulation and Analysis of Hybrid Vehicles. SAE Future Car Congress, Crystal City, Virginia, April. Paper 2000-01-1565, 2000.
16. Boettner D, Paganelli G, Guezennec Y, Rizzoni G, Moran M. Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell System Model for Automotive Vehicle Simulation and Control. ASME Journal of Energy Resources Technology 2002;124(1):20-7.
17. Boettner D, Paganelli G, Guezennec Y, Rizzoni G, Moran M. On-Board Reforming Effects on the Performance of Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Vehicles. ASME Journal of Energy Resources Technology 2002;124(3):191-6.
18. Boettner D. Modeling of PEM Fuel Cell Systems Including Controls and Reforming Effects for Hybrid Automotive Applications. Ph.D. Dissertation. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University; 2001.
19. Berlowitz PJ, Darnell CP. Fuel Choices for Fuel Cell Powered Vehicles. SAE Publication Fuel Cell Power for Transportation 2000 (SP-1505), 2000, Paper 2000-01-0003, p. 15-25.
20. Brown LF. A Comparative Study of Fuels for On-Board Hydrogen Production for Fuel-Cell-Powered Automobiles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2001;26:381-97.
21. Ogden JM, Kreutz TG, Steinbugler MM. Fuels for Fuel Cell Vehicles. Fuel Cells Bulletin 2000;3(16):5-12.
22. Wegeng RS, Pederson LR, TeGrotenhuis WE, Whyatt GA. Compact Fuel Processors for Fuel Cell Powered Automobiles Based on MicroChannel Technology. Fuel Cells Bulletin 2001;3(28):8-13.
23. Kumar R, Ahmed S, Krumpelt M. The Low-Temperature Partial-Oxidation Reforming of Fuels for Transportation Fuel Cell Systems. Fuel Cell Seminar Program and Abstracts, Orlando, Florida, November 17-20. 1996, p. 750-3.
24. Kreith F, West RE, Isler BE. Efficiency of Advanced Natural Gas Transportation Technologies. ASME Journal of Energy Resources Technology 2002;124(3):173-9.