The lay perspective in health technology assessment

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 511-517

  Ong, Bie Nio ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION SCIENCE; PATIENT CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; REVIEW; SOCIETY;

HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TECHNICAL EXPERTISE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 9544220643     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Banta, H. D., Schersten, T., & Jonsson, E. Implications of minimally invasive therapy. In H. D. Banta (ed.), Minimally invasive therapy in five European countries. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1993, 167-77.
2. Banta, H. D., & Vondeling, H. Strategies for successful evaluation and policy-making toward health care technology on the move: The case of medical lasers. Social Science and Medicine, 1994, 38, 1663-74.
3. Bowling, A., Jacobson, B., & Southgate, L. Exploration in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district. Social Science and Medicine, 1993, 37, 851-77.
4. Buxton, M. Problems in the economic appraisal of new health technology: The evaluation of heart transplants in the U.K. In M. Drummond (ed.), Economic appraisal of health technology in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1987.
5. Cohen, J. Appropriate technology in primary health care: Evolution and meaning of WHO's concept. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1989, 5, 103-09.
6. Drummond, M. Test drive. Health Service Journal, 1992 (October 22), 26-27.
7. Eddy, D. What's going on in Oregon? Journal of the American Medical Association, 1991, 266, 417-20.
8. Green, A., & Barker, C. Priority setting and economic appraisal: Whose priorities - the community or the economist? Social Science and Medicine, 1988, 26, 919-29.
9. Helman, C. Culture, health and illness. Bristol: Wright, 1985.
10. Hopkins, A., Gabbay, J., & Neuberger, J. Role of users of health care in achieving a quality service. Quality in Health Care, 1994, 3, 203-09.
11. Hopton, J., & Dlugolecka, M. Patients' perceptions of need for primary health care services: Useful for priority setting? British Medical Journal, 1995, 310, 1237-40.
12. Irving, M. Health technology assessment. In M. Deighan & S. Hitch (eds.), Clinical effectiveness from guidelines to cost-effective practice. Brentwood: Early brave Publications, 1995, 7-10.
13. Jennett, B. Assessment of clinical technologies: Importance of provision and use. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1988, 4, 435-45.
14. Kleinman, A. Patients and healers in the context of culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1980.
15. Kuhn, T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
16. McKeown, K., Whitelaw, S., Hambleton, D., & Green, F. Setting priorities: Science, art or politics. In M. Malek (ed.), Setting priorities in health care. London: John Wiley and Sons, 1994, 19-29.
17. Mullen, P. Priority setting in health care: Techniques and pitfalls. Paper presented at the EURO-ORAHS conference on Managing health care under resource constraints, Maastricht, July 23-28, 1995.
18. Oakley, A. Women confined. Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1980.
19. Richardson, A., & Sykes, W. Eliciting public values in health care: A report on health panels set up by Somerset Health Commission. London, July 1995.
20. Stocking, B. Promoting change in clinical care. Quality in Health Care, 1992, 1, 56-60.
21. Stocking, B. The future starts here. Health Service Journal, 1992 (October 1), 26-28.
22. Vang, J. Technology assessment and primary health care in Europe: Issues and problems. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1989, 5, 111-19.
23. Williams, G., & Popay, J. Lay knowledge and the privilege of experience. In J. Gabe, D. Kelleher, & G. Williams (eds.), Challenging medicine. London: Routledge, 19XX, 118-39.
24. World Health Organization/UNICEF. Primary health care: the Alma Ata conference. Geneva: WHO, 1978.