Understanding information graphics: A discourse-level problem

Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2003 Workshop - 4th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Carberry, Sandra ^a   Elzer, Stephanie ^a   Green, Nancy ^b   McCoy, Kathleen ^a   Chester, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

Discourse; Graphics; Plan based models; Understanding

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

DISCOURSE; DISCOURSE STRUCTURE; GRAPHIC; INFORMATION GRAPHICS; KNOWLEDGE SOURCES; NATURAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS; PLAN-BASED; PLAN-BASED MODEL; SIGHT IMPAIRED; UNDERSTANDING;

CHARACTER RECOGNITION;

EID: 9444292424     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. L. Ardisonno and D. Sestero. 1996. Using dynamic user models in the recognition of the plans of the user. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5(2):157-190.
2. S. Carberry and L. Lambert. 1999. A process model for recognizing communicative acts and modeling negotiation subdialogues. Computational Linguistics, 25(1):1-53.
3. S. Carberry. 1990. Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue. ACL-MIT Press Series on Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. S. Card, T. Moran, and A. Newell. 1983. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ.
5. E. Charniak and R. Goldman. 1993. A bayesian model of plan recognition. Artificial Intelligence, 64:53-79.
6. H. Clark. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
7. M. Corio and G. Lapalme. 1999. Generation of texts for information graphics. In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation EWNLG'99, pages 49-58.
8. S. Elzer, N. Green, and S. Carberry. 2003a. Exploiting cognitive psychology research for recognizing intention in information graphics. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. To appear.
9. S. Elzer, N. Green, S. Carberry, and K. McCoy. 2003. Extending plan inference techniques to recognize intentions in information graphics. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on User Modeling. To appear.
10. A. Gertner and B. Webber. 1996. A Bias Towards Relevance: Recognizing Plans Where Goal Minimization Fails. In Proc. of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1133-1138.
11. H. P. Grice. 1969. Utterer's Meaning and Intentions. Philosophical Review, 68:147-177.
12. B. Grosz and C. Sidner. 1986. Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3):175-204.
13. B. John and A. Newell. 1990. Toward an engineering model of stimulus response compatibility. In R. Gilmore and T. Reeve, editors, Stimulusresponse compatibility: An integrated approach, pages 107-115. North-Holland, New York.
14. A. Kennel. 1996. Audiograf: A diagram-reader for the blind. In Second Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, pages 51-56.
15. S. Kerpedjiev and S. Roth. 2000. Mapping communicative goals into conceptual tasks to generate graphics in discourse. In Proc. of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 60-67.
16. S. Kosslyn. 1989. Understanding charts and graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3:185-226.
17. D. Litman and J. Allen. 1987. A Plan Recognition Model for Subdialogues in Conversation. Cognitive Science, 11:163-200.
18. G. Lohse. 1993. A cognitive model for understanding graphical perception. Human-Computer Interaction, 8:353-388.
19. Peter B. Meijer. 1992. An experimental system for auditory image representations. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 39(2):291-300, February.
20. V. Mittal. 1997. Visual prompts and graphical design: A framework for exploring the design space of 2-D charts and graphs. In Proc. of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 57-63.
21. R. Perrault and J. Allen. 1980. A Plan-Based Analysis of Indirect Speech Acts. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 6(3-4):167-182.
22. J. Russo. 1978. Adaptation of cognitive processes to eye movement systems. In J. Senders, D. Fisher, and R. Monty, editors, Eye movements and higher psychological functions. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
23. J. Searle. 1970. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, London.
24. G. Silber and K. McCoy. 2000. Efficient text summarization using lexical chains. In Proc. of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 252-255.
25. C. Wickens and M. Carswell. 1995. The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors, 37(3):473-494.
26. R. Wilensky. 1983. Planning and Understanding. Addison-Wesley.
27. J. Yu, J. Hunter, E. Reiter, and S. Sripada. 2002. Recognising visual patterns to communicate gas turbine time-series data. In ES2002, pages 105-118.