Rough truth, consequence, consistency and belief revision

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3066, Issue , 2004, Pages 95-102

  Banerjee, Mohua ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DECISION MAKING; FORMAL LOGIC; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SEMANTICS;

FORMAL DEDUCTIVE APPARATUS; INFORMATION SYSTEM; ROUGH BELIEF CHANGE; ROUGH CONSEQUENCE; BELIEF CHANGE; BELIEF REVISION; CONSISTENCY PRESERVATION; DESIRABLE FEATURES; SOUND AND COMPLETE;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ROUGH SET THEORY;

EID: 9444287065     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25929-9_10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Alchourrón, C., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: partial meet functions for contraction and revision. J. Symb. Logic 50 (1985) 510-530.
2. Banerjee, M., Chakraborty, M.K.: Rough consequence and rough algebra. In: W.P. Ziarko, editor, Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Knowledge Discovery, Proc. Int. Workshop on Rough Sets and Knowledge Discovery (RSKD'93), pages 196-207. Springer-Verlag, 1994.
3. Banerjee, M., Chakraborty, M.K.: Rough logics: a survey with further directions. In: E. Orlłowska, editor, Incomplete Information: Rough Set Analysis, pages 579-600. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
4. Chakraborty, M.K., Banerjee, M.: Rough consequence. Bull. Polish Acad. Sc. (Math.) 41(4) (1993) 299-304.
5. Gärdenfors, P., Rott, H.: Belief revision. In: D.M. Gabbay, C.J. Hogger and J.A. Robinson, editors, Handbook of Logic in AI and Logic Programming, Vol.4: Epistemic and Temporal Reasoning, pages 35-132. Clarendon, 1995.
6. Gomolinska, A., Pearce, D.: Disbelief change. In: Spinning Ideas: Electronic Festschrift in Honour of P. Gärdenfors. N-E. Sahlin, editor, http://www.lucs.lu.se/spinning/, 2000.
7. Hughes, G.E., Cresswell, M.J.: A New Introduction to Modal Logic. Routledge, 1996.
8. Komorowski, J., Pawlak, Z., Polkowski, L., Skowron, A.: Rough sets: a tutorial. In: S.K. Pal and A. Skowron, editors, Rough Fuzzy Hybridization: A New Trend in Decision-Making, pages 3-98. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
9. Lepage, F., Lapierre, S.: Partial logic and the dynamics of epistemic states. In: Spinning Ideas: Electronic Festschrift in Honour of P. Gärdenfors, N-E. Sahlin, editor, http://www.lucs.lu.se/spinning/, 2000.
10. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comp. Inf. Sci. 11 (1982) 341-356.
11. Pawlak, Z.: Rough logic. Bull. Polish Acad. Sc. (Tech. Sc.) 35(5-6) (1987) 253-258.
12. Pawlak, Z., Banerjee, M.: A logic for rough truth. Preprint, 2004.
13. Rott, H.: Change, Choice and Inference: A Study of Belief Revision and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. Clarendon, 2001.
14. Spinning Ideas: Electronic Festschrift in Honour of P. Gärdenfors. N-E. Sahlin, editor, http://www.lucs.lu.se/spinning/, 2000.
15. Studia Logica, Special Issue on Belief Revision, 73, 2003.
16. Wassermann, R.: Generalized change and the meaning of rationality postulates. Studia Logica 73 (2003) 299-319.