Health motivation and emotional vigilance in genetic testing for prostate cancer risk

Clinical Genetics

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 512-516

  Li, Y ^a,b   Doukas, David J ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic testing; Hereditary prostate cancer; Medical ethics; Structural equation modeling; Survey research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONALITY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DATA COLLECTION; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 9444285498     PISSN: 00099163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00351.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lerman C, Shields AE. Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: the promise and the pitfalls. Nat Rev Cancer 2004: 4: 235-241.
2. Khoury MJ. From genes to public health: the applications of genetic technology in disease prevention. Am J Public Health 1996: 86: 1717-1722.
3. Coughlin SS. The intersection of genetics, public health, and preventive medicine (editorial). Am J Prev Med 1998: 16: 89-90.
4. Bowles Biesecker B, Ishibe N, Hadley DW et al. Psychosocial factors predicting BRCA1/BRCA2 testing decisions in members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Am J Med Genet 2000: 93: 257-263.
5. Lerman C, Schwartz MD, Narod S. The influence of psychological distres on use of genetic testing for cancer risk. J Consult Clin Psychol 1997: 65: 414-420.
6. Lerman C, Hughes C, Trock BJ et al. Genetic testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. JAMA 1999: 281 (17): 1618-1622.
7. Bleiker EM, Hahn DE, Aaronson NK. Psychosocial issues in cancer genetics-current status and future directions. Acta Oncol 2003: 42 (4): 276-286.
8. Almqvist EW, Brinkman RR, Wiggins S, Hayden MR. Psychological consequences and predictors of adverse events in the first 5 years after predictive testing for Huntington's disease. Clin Genet 2003: 64 (4): 300-309.
9. Esplen MJ, Urquhart C, Butler K, Gallinger S, Aronson M, Wong J. The experience of loss and anticipation of distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic testing. J Psychosom Res 2003: 55 (5): 427-435.
10. Esplen MJ, Madlensky L, Butler K et al. Motivations and psychosocial impact of genetic testing for HNPCC. Am J Med Genet 2001: 103 (1): 9-15.
11. Coyne JC, Kruus L, Racioppo M, Calzone KA, Armstrong K. What do ratings of cancer-specific distress mean among women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer? Am J Med Genet 2003: 116A (3): 222-228.
12. Bosompra K, Ashikaga T, Flynn BS, Worden JK, Solomon LJ. Psychosocial factors associated with the public's willingness to pay for genetic testing for cancer risk: a structural equations model. Health Educ Res 2001: 16 (2): 157-172.
13. Coyne JC, Benazon NR, Gaba CG, Calzone K, Weber BL. Distress and psychiatric morbidity among women from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000: 68 (5): 864-874.
14. Audrain J, Rimer B, Cella D et al. Genetic counseling and testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility: what do women want? J Clin Oncol 1998: 16 (1): 133-138.
15. Trask PC, Paterson AG, Wang C et al. Cancer-specific worry interference in women attending a breast and ovarian cancer risk evaluation program: impact on emotional distress and health functioning. Psychooncology 2001: 10 (5): 349-360.
16. Croyle RT, Lerman C. Psychological impact of genetic testing. In: Psychosocial Effects of Screening for Disease Prevention and Detection (Croyle RT, ed). New York: Oxford University Press, 1995: 11-38.
17. Croyle RT, Smith KR, Botkin JR, Baty B, Nash J. Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: preliminary findings. Health Psychol 1997: 16 (1): 63-72.
18. Lerman C, Biesecker B, Benkendorf JL et al. Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997: 89 (2): 148-157.
19. Nowak R. Genetic testing set for takeoff. Science 1994: 2265: 464-467.
20. Myers RE, Hyslop T, Jennings-Dozier K et al. Intention to be tested for prostate cancer risk among African-American men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000: 9 (12): 1323-1328.
21. Stein CM, Song Y, Elston RC, Jun G, Tiwari HK, Iyengar SK. Structural equation model-based genome scan for the metabolic syndrome. BMC Genet 2003: 4 (Suppl. 1): S99.
22. Hoyle RH. Introduction to the special section: structural equation modeling in clinical research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994: 62 (3): 427-428.
23. Morris RJ, Bergan JR, Fulginiti JV. Structural equation modeling in clinical assessment research with children. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991: 59 (3): 371-379.
24. Buncher CR, Succop PA, Dietrich KN. Structural equation modeling in environmental risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 1991: 90: 209-213.
25. Myers RE, Ross E, Jepson C et al. Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 1994: 23 (2): 142-151.
26. MacCallum RC, Austin JT. Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annu Rev Psychol 2000: 51: 201-226.
27. Anderson RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995: 36: 1-10.
28. Stein J, Newcomb M, Bentler P. Differential effects of parent and grandparent drug use of behavior problems of male and female children. Dev Psychol 1993: 29: 31-43.
29. Doukas DJ, Fetters MD, Coyne JC, McCullough LB. How men view genetic testing for prostate cancer risk: findings from focus groups. Clin Genet 2000: 58 (3): 169-176.
30. Myers RE, Chodak GW, Wolf TA et al. Adherence by African American men to prostate cancer education and early detection. Cancer 1999: 86 (1): 88-104.
31. Kaplan D. Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions. Thousand Oaks: CA. Sage Publications, Inc., 2000.
32. Petersen S, Heesacker M, deWitt Marsh R. Medical decision making among cancer patients. J Couns Psychol 2001: 48: 239-244.
33. Ward A, Lyubomirsky S, Sousa L, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Can't quite commit: rumination and uncertainty. Personality social. Psychol Bull 2003: 29: 96-107.
34. Biesecker BB, Peters KF. Process studies in genetic counseling: peering into the black box. Am J Med Genet 2001: 106 (3): 191-198.