An instance-based state representation for network repair

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 287-292

  Littman, Michael L ^a   Ravi, Nishkam ^a   Fenson, Eitan ^b   Howard, Rich ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PnP Networks Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST POLICY; DECISION MAKERS (DM); NETWORK REPAIR; STATE REPRESENTATION;

COMPUTER NETWORKS; COSTS; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK; PLANNING; PUBLIC POLICY; SERVERS; SET THEORY;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 9444284311     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bohra, A.; Neamtiu, I.; Gallard, P.; Sultan, F.; and Iftode, L. 2004. Remote repair of OS state using backdoors. Technical Report DCS-TR-543, Rutgers Univ.
2. Chrisman, L. 1992. Reinforcement learning with perceptual aliasing: The perceptual distinctions approach. In Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 183-188. San Jose, California: AAAI Press.
3. Greiner, R.; Grove, A. J.; and Roth, D. 1996. Learning active classifiers. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-96), 207-215.
4. Guo, A. 2002. Active classification with bounded resources. At http://cs.umass.edu/anyuan/publications/SSS402AGuo.ps.
5. Kaelbling, L. P.; Littman, M. L.; and Cassandra, A. R. 1998. Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence 101(1-2):99-134.
6. Kearns, M.; Mansour, Y.; and Ng, A. Y. 1999. A sparse sampling algorithm for near-optimal planning in large Markov decision processes. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-99), 1324-1331.
7. Li, X.; Martin, R.; Nagaraja, K.; Nguyen, T. D.; and Zhang, B. 2002. Mendosus: A SAN-based fault-injection test-bed for the construction of highly available network services. In First Workshop on Novel Uses of System Area Networks (SAN-1).
8. Littman, M. L.; Sutton, R. S.; and Singh, S. 2002. Predictive representations of state. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14, 1555-1561.
9. McCallum, A. K. 1995a. Reinforcement Learning with Selective Perception and Hidden State. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester.
10. McCallum, R. A. 1995b. Instance-based utile distinctions for reinforcement learning with hidden state. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, 387-395. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Moore, A. W.; Atkeson, C. G.; and Schaal, S. 1995. Memory-based learning for control. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-95-18, CMU Robotics Institute.
12. Ormoneit, D., and Sen, S. 2002. Kernel-based reinforcement learning. Machine Learning 49:161-178.
13. Santamaría, J. C.; Sutton, R. S.; and Ram, A. 1997. Experiments with reinforcement learning in problems with continuous state and action spaces. Adaptive Behavior 6(2): 163-217.
14. Smart, W. D., and Kaelbling, L. P. 2000. Practical reinforcement learning in continuous spaces. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2000), 903-910.
15. Sutton, R. S., and Barto, A. G. 1998. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. The MIT Press.
16. Turney, P. D. 1995. Cost-sensitive classification: Empirical evaluation of a hybrid genetic decision tree induction algorithm. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2:369-409.
17. Zubek, V. B., and Dietterich, T. G. 2002. Pruning improves heuristic search for cost-sensitive learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 27-34.