Empathic embodied interfaces: Addressing users' affective state

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3068, Issue , 2004, Pages 53-64

  Prendinger, H ^a,b   Dohi, H ^b   Wang, H ^b   Mayer, S ^b   Ishizuka, M ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; SPEECH PROCESSING; DATA ACQUISITION; FEEDBACK; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MAPPING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EMBODIED CHARACTERS; EMBODIED INTERFACES; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; INTERFACE AGENT; INTERFACE APPLICATIONS; PHYSIOLOGICAL DATA; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; VIRTUAL JOB INTERVIEW;

INTERFACE STATES; USER INTERFACES;

ANIMATED INTERFACES; CHARACTER BASED INTERFACES; EMOTIONS; INTERACTION PARTNERS;

EID: 9444247618     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24842-2_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Andŕe, E. and Müller, M. E. (2003). Learning affective behavior. In Proceedings HCI International 2003 (Vol.4), pages 512-516.
2. Bickmore, T. (2003). Relational Agents: Effecting Change through Human-Computer Relationships. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
3. Conati, C. (2002). Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16:555-575.
4. Jensen, F. (2001). Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Springer, Berlin New York.
5. Klein, J., Moon, Y., and Picard, R. (2002). This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results. Interacting with Computers, 14:119-140.
6. Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50(5):372-385.
7. Levenson, R. W. (1988). Emotion and the autonomic nervous system: A prospectus for research on autonomic specificity. In Wagner, H. L., editor, Social Psychophy-siology and Emotion: Theory and Clinical Applications, pages 17-42. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
8. Lisetti, C., Nasoz, F., LeRouge, C., Ozyer, O., and Alvarez, K. (2003). Developing multimodal intelligent affective interfaces for tele-home health care. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1-2):245-255.
9. Microsoft (1998). Developing for Microsoft Agent. Microsoft Press.
10. Norsys (2003). Norsys Software Corp. Netica. URL: http://www.norsys.com.
11. Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective Computing. The MIT Press.
12. Prendinger, H. and Ishizuka, M., editors (2004). Life-Like Characters. Tools, Affective Functions, and Applications. Cognitive Technologies. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
13. Prendinger, H., Mayer, S., Mori, J., and Ishizuka, M. (2003). Persona effect revisited. Using bio-signals to measure and reflect the impact of character-based interfaces. In Fourth International Working Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA-03), pages 283-291.
14. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. (1998). The Media Equation. How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places. CSLI Publications, Center for the Study of Language and Information. Cambridge University Press.
15. Thought Technology (2002). Thought Technology Ltd. URL: http://www.thoughttechnology.com.
16. van Mulken, S., Andŕe, E., and Müller, J. (1998). The Persona Effect: How substantial is it? In Proceedings Human Computer Interaction (HCI-98), pages 53-66, Berlin. Springer.
17. Ward, R. and Marsden, P. (2003). Physiological responses to different WEB page designs. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59:199-212.