Situational leadership style as a predictor of success and productivity among Taiwanese business organizations

Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

Volumn 135, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 399-412

  Silverthorne, Colin ^a   Wang, Ting Hsin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

^b California Management Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Leadership; Productivity; Taiwan

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; PHILOSOPHY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PRODUCTIVITY; TAIWAN;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; COMMERCE; EFFICIENCY; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHIES; TAIWAN;

EID: 9444233455     PISSN: 00223980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223980109603707     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson, T. D. (1992). Transforming leadership. Amherst, MA: Human Resource Development Press.
2. Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper Row.
3. Benson, F. (1994). One right way doesn't work with leadership either. Journal of Quality and Participation, 17(4), 86-89.
4. Blank, W., Weitzel, J., & Green, S. (1990). Situational leadership theory. Personnel Psychology, 6, 579-597.
5. Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1994). Built to last. New York: Harper.
6. Greenberg, J. (1996). Managing behavior in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Hambleton, R. K., & Gumpert, R. (1982). The validity of Hersey and Blanchard's theory of leader effectiveness. Group and Organizational Studies, 7(2), 225-242.
8. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. (1988). LEAD questionnaires. Escondido, CA: Center for Leadership Studies Press.
9. Hersey, P., Blanchard, K., & Johnson, D. E. (1996). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Hui, C. H., & Tan, C. K. (1996). Employee motivation and attitudes in the Chinese workforce. In M. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
11. Irgens, O. M. (1995). Situational leadership: A modification of Hersey and Blanchard's model. Leadership and Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 36-39.
12. Ma, L. C., & Smith, K. (1992). Social correlates of Confucian ethics in Taiwan. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 655-659.
13. Marsh, R. M. (1996). The great transformation: Social change in Taipei, Taiwan since the 1960s. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
14. Podsakoff, P. M., Niehoff, B. P., MacKenzie, S. B., & Williams, M .L. (1993). Do substitutes for leadership really substitute for leadership? An empirical examination of Kerr and Jermier's situational leadership model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 1-44.
15. Punnett, B. J. (1995). Preliminary considerations of Confucianism and needs in the PRC. Journal of Asia Pacific Business, 1(1), 25-42.
16. Robbins, S. P. (1996) Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, applications (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17. Rusbult, C. E., Insko, C. A., & Lin, Y. H. W. (1995). Seniority based reward allocation in the United States and Taiwan. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(1), 13-30.
18. Stone, R. A. (1990). Leadership style and managers' attitudes toward using personal computers: A field study. Psychological Reports, 67(3), 915-922.
19. Vecchio, R. (1987). Situational leadership theory: An examination of a prescriptive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 444-451.
20. Yukl, G. A. (1994). Leadership in organizations (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.