ARGO-LIB: A generic platform for decision procedures

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3097, Issue , 2004, Pages 213-217

  Marić, Filip ^a   Janičić, Predrag ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); CODES (STANDARDS); COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; HEURISTIC METHODS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; THEOREM PROVING; COMPUTATION THEORY;

DECISION PROCEDURES; SYMBOLIC SIMIULATION; THEORY-SPECIFIC METHODS; C++ LIBRARIES; DECISION PROCEDURE; GENERIC PLATFORMS; SATISFIABILITY MODULO THEORIES; SMT LIBS;

DECISION THEORY; AUTOMATION;

EID: 9444222759     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25984-8_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. C. W. Barrett, D. L. Dill, and Aaron Stump. A Framework for Cooperating Decision Procedures. CADE-17, LNAI 1831. Springer, 2000.
2. R. S. Boyer and J S. Moore. Integrating Decision Procedures into Heuristic Theorem Provers: A Case Study of Linear Arithmetic. Machine Intelligence 11, 1988.
3. A. Bundy. The Use of Explicit Plans to Guide Inductive Proofs. CADE-9, Springer, 1988.
4. CVC Lite, on-line at: http://verify.stanford.edu/CVCL/.
5. ICS. on-line at: http://www.icansolve.com/.
6. P. Janičić and A. Bundy. A General Setting for the Flexible Combining and Augmenting Decision Procedures. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 28(3), 2002.
7. D. Kapur and M. Subramaniam. Using an induction prover for verifying arithmetic circuits. Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 3(1), 2000.
8. G. Nelson and D. C. Oppen. Simplification by cooperating decision procedures. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 1(2), 1979.
9. S. Ranise and D. Deharbe. Light-weight theorem proving for debugging and verifying units of code. SEFM-03). IEEE Computer Society Press, 2003.
10. S. Ranise and C. Tinelli. The SMT-LIB Format: An Initial Proposal. 2003. on-line at: http://goedel.cs.uiowa.edu/smt-lib/.
11. H. Rueß and N. Shankar. Deconstructing Shostak. In Proceedings of the Conference on Logic in Computer Science (LICS), 2001.
12. R. E. Shostak. Deciding combinations of theories. Journal of the ACM, 31(1), January 1984.
13. Aaron Stump, Arumugam Deivanayagam, Spencer Kathol, Dylan Lingelbach, and Daniel Schobel. Rogue deicision procedures. Workshop PDPAR. 2003
14. TSAT++. on-line at: http://www.mrg.dist.unige.it/Tsat.