Experimental aortocoronary saphenous vein graft function after mechanical cardiac massage with the Anstadt Cup

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 295-300

  Anstadt, Mark P ^a   Perez Tamayo, R A ^a   Davies, Mark G ^a   Hagen, Per Otto ^a   St Louis, James S ^a   Hendrickson, Steven C ^a   Abdel Aleem, Salah ^a   Reimer, Keith A ^a   Anstadt, George L ^a   Lowe, James E ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; DRUG DOSAGE; GRAFTS; MUSCLE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANSTADT CUP; AORTOCORONARY SAPHENOUS GRAFT FUNCTION; BRADYKININ; DIRECT MECHANICAL VENTRICULAR ACTUATION; HISTAMINE; MECHANICAL CARDIAC MASSAGE; MYOCARDIAL TRAUMA; NOREPINEPHRINE; SEROTONIN; VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION;

CARDIOLOGY;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; DOG; GRAFT PATENCY; HEART MASSAGE; HEART VENTRICLE FIBRILLATION; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; NONHUMAN; SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT; SMOOTH MUSCLE CONTRACTILITY; VASCULAR SMOOTH MUSCLE; VEIN COMPLIANCE;

EID: 9344228435     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002480-199642040-00012     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Skinner DB: Experimental and clinical evaluations of mechanical ventricular assistance. Am J Cardiol 27: 146-154, 1971.
2. Anstadt MP, Anstadt GL, Lowe JE: Direct mechanical ventricular actuation: a review. Resuscitation 21: 7-23, 1991.
3. Anstadt MP, Tedder M, Lowe JE, Anstadt GL: Clinical Results Using Direct Mechanical Ventricular Actuation. Presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, Nashville, Tennessee, May 7-9, 1992.
4. Anstadt MP, Hendry PJ, Plunkett MD, et al: Mechanical myocardial actuation during ventricular fibrillation improves tolerance to ischemia compared with cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation 82(Suppl IV): IV284-IV290, 1990.
5. Anstadt MP, Hendry PJ, Plunkett MD, et al: Comparison of direct mechanical ventricular actuation and cardiopulmonary bypass. ASAIO Trans 35: 464-467, 1989.
6. Anstadt MP, Taber JE, Hencry PJ, et al: Myocardial tolerance to ischemia after resuscitation: direct mechanical ventricular actuation versus cardiopulmonary bypass. ASAIO Trans 37: M518-M519, 1991.
7. Coogan PS, Casey HW, Skinner DB, Anstadt GL: Direct mechanical ventricular assistance: acute and long-term effects in the dog. Arch Pathol 87: 423-431, 1969.
8. Lowe JE, Anstadt MP, Van Trigt P, et al: First successful bridge to cardiac transplantation using direct mechanical ventricular actuation. Ann Thorac Surg 52: 1237-1245, 1991.
9. Anstadt MP, Tedder SD, Vander Heide RS, et al: Cardiac pathology following resuscitative circulatory support: direct mechanical ventricular actuation versus cardiopulmonary bypass. ASAIO J 38: 75-80, 1992.
10. Anstadt MP, Hendry PJ, Plunkett MD, et al: Mechanical cardiac actuation achieves hemodynamics similar to CPB. Surgery 108: 442-451, 1990.
11. Magovern GJ Jr: The biopump and postoperative circulatory support. Ann Thorac Surg 55: 245-249, 1993.
12. Pae WE Jr, Miller CA, Matthews Y, Pierce WS: Ventricular assist devices for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a combined registry experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 104: 541-553, 1992.
13. Pennington DC, Farrar DJ, Loisance D, Pae WE Jr, Emery RW: Panel selection. Ann Thorac Surg 55: 206-212, 1993.
14. Pierce WS, Hershon JJ, Kormos RL, Dembitsky WP, Noon GP: Management of secondary organ dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg 55: 222-226, 1993.
15. Parascandola SA, Pae WE, Davis PK, et al: Determinants of survival in patients with ventricular assist devises. ASAIO Trans 34: 222-228, 1988.
16. Anstadt MP, Tedder M, Hegde SS, et al: Intraoperative timing may provide criteria for use of post-card iotomy ventricular assist devices. ASAIO J 38: M147-M150, 1992.
17. Anstadt MP, Perez-Tamayo RA, Banit DM, et al: Direct Mechanical Ventricular Actuation Versus Cardiopulmonary Bypass for Postcardiotomy Circulatory Support Following CABG. Presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, January 31-February 2, 1994.
18. Anstadt MP, Banit DM, Perez-Tamayo RA, et al: Non-Blood Contacting Circulatory Support After CABG Does Not Impair Graft Flow. Present at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, April 29-May 1, 1993.
19. Schwartz LB, Pence JC, Kerns BJ, et al: Kinetics of vein graft cell division and function. Surg Forum 47: 362-365, 1991.
20. Davies MG, Hagen P-O: Structural and functional consequences of bypass grafting with autologous vein. Cyobiology 31: 63-70, 1994.