Individual and contextual dynamics of innovation-use behavior in organizations

Human Performance

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 397-414

  Choi, Jin Nam ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 9344222199     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup1704_3     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 50, 179-211.
3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). On the assessment of unidimensional measurement: Internal and external consistency, and overall consistency criteria. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 432-437.
4. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equation program manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.
5. Clayton, P. (1997). Implementation of organizational innovation. San Diego: Academic Press.
6. Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Symposium on applied regression: Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261-1293.
7. Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23, 145-158.
8. Conrad, C., & Haynes, J. (2001). Development of key constructs. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 47-77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
10. Dean, J. W., Jr., Yoon, S. J., & Susman, G. I. (1992). Advanced manufacturing technology and organization structure: Empowerment or subordination? Organization Science, 3, 203-229.
11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
12. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121-147.
13. Edwards, J. R. (1996). An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 292-339.
14. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Fulk, J., Steinfied, C., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G. (1987). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Communication Research, 14, 529-551.
16. Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40, 440-465.
17. James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307-321.
18. Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1055-1080.
19. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47.
20. Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). Implementation characteristics of organizational innovations: Limits and opportunities for management strategies. Communication Research, 15, 603-631.
21. Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645-678.
22. Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351-389.
23. Murtha, T. C., Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1996). Toward an interactionist taxonomy of personality and situations: An integrative situational-dispositional representation of personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 193-207.
24. Nord, W. R., & Tucker, S. (1987). Implementing routine and radical innovations. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
25. O'Reilly, C. (1989). Corporations, culture, and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review, 31 (Summer), 9-25.
26. O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 157-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
27. O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J. A., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487-516.
28. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
29. Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. (1999). Assessing Direct and indirect effects in multilevel designs with latent variables. Sociological Methods & Research, 28, 123-153.
30. Reger, R. K., Gustafson, L. T., Demarie, S. M., & Mullane, J. V. (1994). Refraining the organization: Why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Academy of Management Review, 19, 565-584.
31. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
32. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253.
33. Trafimow, D. (2000). A theory of attitudes, subjective norms, and private versus collective self-concepts. In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context (pp. 47-65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
34. Triandis, H. C. (1994). Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 103-172). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology.
35. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24, 115-139.
36. Zalesny, M. D., & Vecchio, R. P. (1997). Challenges to leadership in the implementation of technological change. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (pp. 502-520). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.