On the tuning of predictive controllers: Inverse optimality and the minimum variance covariance constrained control problem

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 43, Issue 24, 2004, Pages 7807-7814

  Chmielewski, Donald J ^a   Manthanwar, Amit M ^a  

^a Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; FEEDBACK; LINEAR EQUATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

LINEAR FEEDBACK; LINEAR QUADRATIC REGULATOR (LQR); MINIMUM VARIANCE COVARIANCE CONSTRAINED CONTROL (MVC3);

TUNING;

CONTROL;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; LINEAR SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MINIMUM VARIANCE COVARIANCE CONTRAINED CONTROL; PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 9244245243     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie030686e     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Loeblein, C.; Perkins, J. D. Stuctural design for on-line process optimization: I. Dynamic economics of MPC. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 1018.
2. Marchetti, J. L.; Meffichamp, D. A.; Seborg, D. E. Predictive control based on discrete convolution models. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1983, 22, 488.
3. Maurath, P. R.; Laub, A. J.; Mellichamp, D. A.; Seborg, D. E. Predictive controller design by principle component analysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1988, 27, 1204.
4. Callaghan, P. J.; Lee, P. L. An experimental investigation of predictive controller design by principle component analysis. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1988, 66, 345.
5. Clark, D. W.; Scattolini, R. Constrained receding horizon predictive control. IEE Proc. 1991, 138, 347.
6. Rawlings, J.; Muske, K. Stability of constrained receding horizon control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1993, 38, 1512.
7. Ohshima, M.; Hashimoto, I.; Takamatsu, T.; Ohno, H. Robust stability of model predictive control (MPC). Int. Chem. Eng. 1991, 31, 119.
8. Lee, J. H.; Yu, Z. H. Tuning of model predictive controllers for robust performance. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18, 15.
9. Shridhar, R.; Cooper, D. J. A tuning strategy for multivariable model predictive control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 4003.
10. Al-Ghazzawi, A.; Ali, E.; Nouh, A.; Zafiriou, E. On-line tuning strategy for model predictive controllers. J. Process Control 2000, 11, 265.
11. van Hessem, D. H.; Scherer, C. W.; Bosgra, O. H. LMI-based closed-loop economic optimization of stochastic process operation under state and input constraints. In Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control; IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, 2001; p 4228.
12. Chmielewski, D. J. Tuning and steady-state target selection in predictive control: A covariance assignment approach. Presented at the AIChE Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, Nov 12-17, 2000; Paper 257g.
13. Kaiman, R. E. When is a linear control system optimal? Trans. ASME J. Basic Eng. 1964, 51.
14. Andersen, B. D. O.; Moore, J. B. Optimal Control: Linear Quadratic Methods; Prentice Hall Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990.
15. Yokoyama, R.; Kinnen, E. The inverse problem of the optimal regulator. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1972, 17, 497.
16. Park, J. G.; Lee, K. Y. An inverse optimal control problem and its application to the choice of performance index for economic stabilization policy. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybernet. 1975, 5, 64.
17. Boyd, S.; Balakrishnan, V.; Feron, E.; El Ghaoui, L. Control system analysis and synthesis via linear matrix inequalities. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference; IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, 1993; 2147.
18. Sznaier, M.; Damborg, M. J. Suboptimal control of linear systems with state and control inequality constraints. In Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control; IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, 1987; p 761.
19. Chmielewski, D. J.; Manousiouthakis, V. I. On constrained infinite-time quadratic optimal control. Syst. Control Lett. 1996, 29, 121.
20. Scokaert, P. O. M.; Rawlings, J. B. Constrained linear quadratic regulation. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1998, 43, 1163.
21. Zheng, A. Z.; Morari, M. Stability of model predictive control with mixed constraints. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1995, 40, 1818.
22. Mayne, D. Q.; Rawlings, J. B.; Rao, C. V.; Scokaert, P. O. M. Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality. Automatica 2000, 36, 789.
23. Scokaert, P. O. M.; Mayne, D. Q.; Rawlings, J. B. Suboptimal model predictive control (feasibility implies stability). IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1999, 44, 648.
24. Skelton, R. E.; Iwasaki, T.; Grigoriadis, K. M. A Unified Algebraic Approach to Linear Control Design; Taylor & Francis: New York, 1999.
25. Dullerud, G. E.; Paganini, F. A Course in Robust Control Theory: A Convex Approach; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1999.
26. Boyd, S. P.; El Ghaoui, L.; Feron, E.; Balakrishnan, V. Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory; Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM): Philadelphia, PA, 1994.
27. VanAntwerp, J. G.; Braatz, R. B. A tutorial on linear and bilinear matrix inequalities. J. Process Control 2000, 10, 363.
28. Russell, D. L. Mathematics of Finite-Dimensional Control Systems; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1979.
29. Kaiman, R. E.; Koepcke, R. W. Optimal synthesis of linear sampling control systems using generalized performance indexes. Trans. ASME 1958, 80, 1820.
30. Luenberger, D. G. Optimization by Vector Space Methods; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1969.
31. ∞ Methods; Addison-Wesley: New York, 1999.