The development of an adapted Markov chain modelling heuristic and simulation framework in the context of transportation research

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 105-117

  Janssens, Davy ^a   Wets, Geert ^a   Brijs, Tom ^a   Vanhoof, Koen ^a  

^a Transportation Research Institute   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Markov Chain modelling; Monte Carlo simulation; Transportation research

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA REDUCTION; DECISION MAKING; EXPERT SYSTEMS; HEURISTIC PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS;

CODEBOOKS; MARKOV CHAIN MODELING; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH;

MARKOV PROCESSES;

EID: 9244226507     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2004.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., Swami, A. (1993). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data, Washington, DC, USA, May 26-28, (pp. 207-216).
2. Arentze, T. A., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2000). Albatross: a learning-based transportation oriented simulation system European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies. The Netherlands: Eindhoven.
3. Arentze, T. A., Katoshevski, R., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2001). A micro-simulation model of activity-travel behavior of individuals in urban environments. Electronic Proceedings of the Seventh International CUPUM Conference, Honolulu, USA, July 18-20.
4. Berchtold, A., & Raftery, A. E. (1999). The mixture transition distribution (MTD) model for high-order Markov chains and non-Gaussian time series. Technical Report 360, Department of Statistics, University of Washington.
5. Clarke, M., Dix, M., & Jones, P. (1981). Error and uncertainty in travel surveys. Transportation, 10, 105-126.
6. Freund, R. J., & Wilson, W. J. (1997). Statistical Methods. London: Academic Press.
7. Greaves, S. P., & Stopher, P. R. (2000). Creating a synthetic household travel and activity survey: rationale and feasibility analysis. Transportation Research Record, 1706, 82-91, TRB, National Research Council. Washington, DC.
8. Janssens, D., Wets, G., Brijs, T. & Vanhoof, K. (2004). Simulating activity diary data by means of sequential probability information: development and evaluation of an initial framework. Electronic Proceedings of the 83th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, January 11-15, USA, p. 22.
9. Koppelman, F. S. (1981). Non-linear utility functions in models of travel choice behavior. Transportation. 10, 127-146.
10. Niemi, I. (1993). Systematic error in behavioural measurement: comparing results from interview and time-budget studies. Social Indicators Research, 30, 229-244.
11. Pegram, G. G. S. (1980). An autoregressive model for multilag Markov chains. Journal of Applied Probability, 17, 350-362.
12. Robinson, J. P. (1985) The validity and reliability of diaries versus alternative time use measurement. Time, Goods and Well-Being, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, pp. 32-62.
13. Stopher, P. R. (1992). Use of an activity-based diary to collect household travel data. Transportation, 19, 159-176.
14. Stopher, P. R., Greaves, S. P. & Bullock, P. (2003). Simulating household travel survey data: application to two urban areas. Electronic conference proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (CD-ROM), January 12-16, Washington, DC.