Why to Base the Knowledge Representation Language on Natural Language?

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-96-04, Issue , 1996, Pages 25-31

  Fernando, Gomez ^a  

^a University of Central Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIVERSE DOMAINS; ITS APPLICATIONS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION LANGUAGE; NATURAL LANGUAGES;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 9144224551     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Allen, J. F. 1984. Towards a general theory of action and time. Artificial Intelligence 23:132-154.
2. Brachman, R., and Schmolze, J. 1985. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science 9:171-216.
3. Brachman, R.; McGuinness, D.; Patel-Schneider, P.; and Resnick, L. 1991. Living with CLASSIC: When and how to use a KL-ONE-like language. In Sowa, J., ed., Principles of Semantic Networks. Morgan Kauf-mann Publishers, Inc.
4. Carey, S. 1985. Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
5. Carnap, R. 1956. Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
8. Fodor, J. 1981. the present status if the innateness controversy. In Representations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
9. Gomez, F., and Segami, C. 1991. Classification-based reasoning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 21:644-659.
10. Gomez, F.; Hull, R.; and Segami, C. 1994. Acquiring knowledge from encyclopedic texts. In Proc. of the ACL's 4th Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, ANLP94, 84-90.
11. Gomez, F.; Segami, C; and Hull, R. 1997. Determining prepositional attachment, prepositional meaning, verb meaning and thematic roles. Computational Intelligence 13(1). To appear.
12. Gomez, F. 1996. Acquiring intersentential explanatory connections in expository texts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 4(l):19-44.
13. Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
14. Hull, R. 1994. Acquisition of historical knowledge from encyclopedic texts. Technical report, University of Central Florida, Department of Computer Science. CS-TR-94-05, dissertation proposal.
15. Jackendoff, R. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
16. Keil, F. 1989. Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
17. Lenat, D., and Guha, R. 1989. Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: representation and inference in the CYC project. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
18. Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. MacGregor, R. 1993. Representing reified relations in loom. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5:179-183.
20. Quine, V. 1953. From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
21. Quine, V. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
22. Whorf, B. 1956. Language, thought, and reality: selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Carroll, J.B. (ed).
23. Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Black well.
24. Zadrozny, W. 1994. Reasoning with background knowledge - a three-level theory. Computational Intelligence 10(2):150-184.