Value of endorectal coil versus body coil MRI for diagnosis of recurrent pelvic malignancies

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 345-352

  Huch Boni R A ^a   Meyenberger, C ^a   Pok Lundquist, J ^b   Trinkler, F ^a   Lutolf U ^a   Krestin, G P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITÄTSSPITAL ZÜRICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Anorectal carcinoma; Body coil; Endorectal surface coil; Gynecologic cancer; MRI; Prostate carcinoma; Recurrence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIS TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; RECTUM CANCER; RECTUM RESECTION; RECURRENT CANCER; UTERUS TUMOR;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANUS NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PELVIC NEOPLASMS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 8944243548     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002619900079     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ebner F, Kressel HY, Mintz MC, et al. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the female pelvis: differentiation with MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1988;166:333-340
2. Glazer HS, Lee JKT, Levitt RG, et al. Radiation fibrosis: differentiation from recurrent tumor by MR imaging. Work in progress. Radiology 1985;156:721-726
3. Moss AA, Thoeni RF, Schnyder P, et al. Value of computed tomography in the detection and staging of recurrent rectal carcinomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;5:870-874
4. McCarthy S, Barnes D, Devney A, et al. Detection of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective evaluation of CT and clinical factors. AJR 1985;144:577-579
5. Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA, et al. Colorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT: preoperative staging and detection of postoperative recurrence. Radiology 1986;158:347-353
6. Wasserman NF, Kapoor DA, Hildebrandt WC, et al. Transrectal US in evaluation of patients after radical prostatectomy. Part I. Normal postoperative anatomy. Radiology 1992;185:361-366
7. Wasserman NF, Kapoor DA, Hildebrandt WC, et al. Transrectal US in evaluation of patients after radical prostatectomy. Part II. Transrectal US and biopsy findings in the presence of residual and early recurrent prostatic cancer. Radiology 1992;185:367-372
8. Huch Boni RA, Boner JA, Lütolf UM, et al. Local staging of prostate carcinoma: contribution of contrast-enhanced, endorectal coil MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr, in press.
9. Schiebler M, Schnall M, Pollack H, et al. Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Radiology 1993;189:339-352
10. Quinn S, Franzini D, Demlow T, et al. MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: correlation with whole-mount specimens. Radiology 1994;190:323-327
11. Milestone BN, Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE, et al. Cervical carcinoma: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. Radiology 1991;180:91-95
12. Chan TW, Kressel HY, Milestone B, et al. Rectal carcinoma: staging with MR imaging with endorectal surface coil. Work in progress. Radiology 1991;181:461-467
13. de Lange EE, Fechner RE, Wanebo HJ. Suspected recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma after abdominoperineal resection: MR imaging and histopathologic findings. Radiology 1989;170:323-328
14. Ebner F, Ranner G, FLückiger F. Differenzierung von Narbengewebe und Tumorrezidiv nach Therapie von Tumoren des weiblichen Beckens. Radiologe 1994;34:384-389
15. Lange PH, Ercole CJ, Lightner EJ, et al. The value of serum prostate specific antigen determinations before and after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1989;141:873-879
16. Hudson MA, Bahnson RR, Catalonas WJ. Clinical use of prostate specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 1989;142:1011-1017
17. Müller-Schimpfle M, Brix G, Layer G, et al. Recurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis with dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1993;189:181-189
18. Krestin GP, Steinbrich W, Friedmann G. Recurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis with MR imaging versus CT. Radiology 1988;168:307-311
19. Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D, Chalmers AG, et al. Endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in the staging of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1988;75:1019-1022
20. Beynnon J, Mortensen NJ, Channer JI, et al. The detection and evaluation of locally recurrent rectal cancer with rectal endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:509-517
21. Balzarini L, Ceglia E, D'Ippolito G, et al. Local recurrence of rectosigmoid cancer: what about the choice of MRI for diagnosis? Gastrointest Radiol 1990:338-342
22. Ito K, Kato T, Tadokor M, et al. Recurrent rectal cancer and scar: differentiation with PET and MR imaging. Radiology 1992;182:549-552
23. Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandels LS, et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology 1988;166:623-631
24. Williams MP, Husband JE, Heron CW, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. Br J Radiol 1989;62:544-550
25. Waggenspack GA, Amparo EG, Hannigan EV. MR imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12:409-414
26. Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Sawada T, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1992;182:643-648
27. Fleuckiger F, Ebner F, Poschauko H, et al. Cervical cancer: serial MR imaging before and after primary radiation therapy - a 2-year follow-up study. Radiology 1992;184:89-93
28. Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis. AJR 1983;1141:1119-1128
29. Chang YCF, Hricak H, Thurnher S, et al. Vagina: evaluation with MR imaging. Part II. Neoplasms. Radiology 1988;169:175-179