A population-based study of colorectal cancer test use: Results from the 2001 California health interview survey

Cancer

Volumn 101, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 2523-2532

  Etzioni, David A ^a,b   Ponce, Ninez A ^b,c   Babey, Susan H ^c   Spencer, Benjamin A ^b,d   Brown, E Richard ^c   Ko, Clifford Y ^a,d,e   Chawla, Neetu ^c   Breen, Nancy ^f   Klabunde, Carrie N ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^f NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Colorectal neoplasms; Endoscopy; Ethnic groups; Mass screening; Occult blood; Prevention and control; Statistics and numeric data; Utilization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CANCER TEST; COLORECTAL CANCER; CULTURAL FACTOR; DATA ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OCCULT BLOOD; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

AGED; CALIFORNIA; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INSURANCE COVERAGE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; PATIENT EDUCATION; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 8844275474     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20692     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. American Cancer Society and Public Health Institute, California Cancer Registry. California cancer facts and figures, 2001. Oakland: American Cancer Society, California Division, 2000.
2. Ries L, Eisner M, Kosary C, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2000. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2000.
3. Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1704-1713.
4. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures, 2003. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2003.
5. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:129-131.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Screening for colorectal cancer - United States, 1992-1993, and new guidelines. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996;45:107-110.
7. Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2003;97:1528-1540.
8. O'Malley A, Beaton E, Yabroff K, Abramson R, Mandelblatt J. Patient and provider barriers to colorectal cancer screening in the primary care safety-net. Prev Med. 2004;39:56-63.
9. Beeker C, Kraft J, Southwell B, Jorgensen C. Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention. J Commun Health. 2000;25:263-278.
10. Holmes-Rovner M, Williams G, Hoppough S, Quillan L, Butler R, Given C. Colorectal cancer screening barriers in persons with low income. Cancer Pract. 2002;10:240-247.
11. Seeff L, Nadel M, Klabunde C, et al. Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population. Cancer. 2004;100:2093-2103.
12. Greiner K, Engelman K, Hall M, Ellerbeck E. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care. Prev Med. 2004;38:269-275.
13. Mandelson M, Curry S, Anderson L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening participation by older women. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19:149-154.
14. Adams E, Thorpe K, Becker E, Joski P, Flome J. Colorectal cancer screening, 1997-1999: role of income, insurance and policy. Prev Med. 2004;38:551-557.
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in screening for colorectal cancer - United States, 1997 and 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:162-166.
16. Ponce NA, Lavarreda SA, Yen W, Brown ER, DiSogra C, Satter D. Translation methodology in the California Health Interview Survey: challenges in language translation for a major survey. Public Health Rep. 2004;119:1-18.
17. California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2001 methodology series: Report 1 - sample design. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, 2002.
18. California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2001 methodology series: Report 2 - data collection methods. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, 2002.
19. California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2001 methodology series: Report 3 - data processing procedures. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, 2002.
20. California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2001 methodology series: Report 4 - response rates. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, 2002.
21. Andersen RM, Yu H, Wyn R, Davidson PL, Brown ER, Teleki S. Access to medical care for low-income persons: how do communities make a difference? Med Care Res Rev. 2002;59:384-411.
22. Seeff LC, Shapiro JA, Nadel MR. Are we doing enough to screen for colorectal cancer? Findings from the 1999 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. J Fam Pract. 2002;51:761-766.
23. Shi R, Berkel H, Sartor O. Comparison of utilization of preventive health care services between two racial populations. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10:454.
24. Corbie-Smith G, Flagg EW, Doyle JP, O'Brien MA. Influence of usual source of care on differences by race/ethnicity in receipt of preventive services. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:458-464.
25. Potosky AL, Breen N, Graubard BI, Parsons PE. The association between health care coverage and the use of cancer screening tests. Results from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey. Med Care. 1998;36:257-270.
26. Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Warda US. Demographic predictors of cancer screening among Filipino and Korean immigrants in the United States. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:62-68.
27. Zhang J, Yu KF. What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1690-1691.
28. Augustson EM, Vadaparampil ST, Paltoo DN, Kidd LR, O'Malley AS. Association between CBE, FOBT, and Pap smear adherence and mammography adherence among older low-income women. Prev Med. 2003;36:734-739.
29. Klabunde CN, Frame PS, Meadow A, Jones E, Nadel M, Vernon SW. A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Prev Med. 2003;36:352-362.
30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Colorectal cancer prevention and control initiatives. Available from URL: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorctl/ [accessed October 16, 2003].
31. California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2001 methodology series: Report 5 - weighting and variance estimation. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, 2002.
32. Newacheck PW, Pearl M, Hughes DC, Halfon N. The role of Medicaid in ensuring children's access to care. JAMA. 1998; 280:1789-1793.
33. Kasper JD, Giovannini TA, Hoffman C. Gaining and losing health insurance: strengthening the evidence for effects on access to care and health outcomes. Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57:298-318; discussion, 319-225.
34. Kaiser Family Foundation. News on Medicaid and state budgets: July and August 2003 update. Available from URL: http://www.kff.org/medicaid/ kcmu4140report.cfm [accessed August 16, 2003].
35. Chimento L, Forbes M, Menges J, Theisen A, Pande N. Simplifying Medi-Cal enrollment: opportunities and challenges in tight fiscal times. Medi-Cal Policy Inst Issue Brief. 2003;6:1-12.