Nike v. Kasky: Reconsideration of noncommercial v. commercial speech

Public Relations Review

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 419-430

  Ki, Eyun Jung ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Commercial speech; Kasky v. Nike; Legal issue in Public relations; Nike v. Kasky; Noncommercial speech; Public relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 8844268434     PISSN: 03638111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2004.08.012     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977)
2. Bolger v. Young's Drug Products Corporation, 463 U.S. 60 (1983)
3. Board of Trustees of the State University of Neeew Yooork v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469 (1989)
4. S.G. Brody J.M. Viggiano Summary of major 2002 commercial speech developments Communication Law 1 2002 22
5. Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 557 (1980)
6. R.K.L. Collins D.M. Skover Commerce and communication Texas Law Review 71 1993 697
7. P.C. Devore R.D. Sack Advertising and commercial speech: A first amendment guide 2001 Practicing Law Institute New York
8. M. Dobrusin Note and comment: Crass commercialism: Is it public debate or sheer profit? The controversy of Kasky v. Nike Whittier Law Review 24 2003 1139
9. E.J. Eberle Practical reason: The commercial speech paradigm Case Western Reserve Law Review 42 1992 411
10. Gower, K. K. (2003). Kasky v. Nike, Inc.: The end of constitutionally protected corporate speech? Paper presented at the Association For Education of Journalism and Mass Communication, Miami, FL
11. R.T. Kaplar Advertising rights: The neglected freedom: Toward a new doctrine of commercial speech 1991 The Media Insititute Arlington, VA
12. (2002, May 14). The Kasky case is complex in its history yet simple in context. Wall Street Journal
13. Kasky v. Nike, Inc., 79 Cal. App. 4th 165 (1st Dist. 2000)
14. Kasky v. Nike, 27 Cal. 4th 939 (2002)
15. A. Kozinski S. Banner Who's afraid of commercial speech Virginia Law Review 76 1990 627
16. M.D. Lurie Issue advertising, commercial expressions, and freedom of speech: A proposed framework for first amendment adjudication Boston College Law Review 28 1987 981
17. A. McGovern Case notes and comments: Kasky v. Nike, Inc.: A reconsideration of the commercial speech doctrine Journal of Art and Entertainment 12 2002 333
18. K.R. Middleton W.E. Lee B.F. Chamberlin The law of public communication 6th ed. 2003 Pearson Boston
19. National Commission on Egg Nutrition and Richard Weiner, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 570 F. 2d 159 (1977)
20. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)
21. Nike, Inc. v. Kasky, 123 S. Ct. 2554 (2003)
22. Pacific Gas & Electric. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of California, 475 U.S. 1 (1986)
23. Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376 (1973)
24. R. Post The constitutional status of commercial speech UCLA Law Review 48 2000 1
25. M.H. Redish The first amendment in the marketplace: Commercial speech and the values of free expression George Washington Law Review 39 1971 429
26. Riley v. National Federation of the Blind of North Carolina, Inc., 487 U.S. 781 (1988)
27. S.M. Simpson The commercial speech doctrine: An analysis of the consequences of basing first amendment protections on the "public interest" New York Law School Law Review 39 1994 575
28. N. Stern In defense of the imprecise definition of commercial speech Maryland Law Review 58 1999 55
29. Valentine v. Chrestensen, 316 U.S. 52 (1942)